Judge weighs disciplinary action for DOJ lawyers in Venezuelan deportations
Judge weighs disciplinary action for DOJ lawyers in Venezuelan deportations

Judge weighs disciplinary action for DOJ lawyers in Venezuelan deportations

How did your country report this? Share your view in the comments.

Diverging Reports Breakdown

Judge weighs disciplinary action for DOJ lawyers in Venezuelan deportations

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg says he may initiate disciplinary proceedings against Justice Department lawyers. A recent whistleblower complaint strengthened the argument that Trump administration officials engaged in criminal contempt of court, he said. The judge has been hearing an American Civil Liberties Union lawsuit brought on behalf of alleged Venezuelan gang members removed from the United States. The detainees in the case were returned to Venezuela last week as part of a prisoner exchange, after spending four months in El Salvador’s CECOT prison. The migrants’ lawyers have disputed the gang membership claims and said their clients were not given a chance to contest the government’s assertions.

Read full article ▼
Jan Wolfe

Reuters

WASHINGTON – U.S. District Judge James Boasberg said on July 24 he may initiate disciplinary proceedings against Justice Department lawyers for their conduct in a lawsuit brought by Venezuelans challenging their removal to a high-security Salvadoran prison in March.

Boasberg, a prominent Washington, D.C., judge who has drawn President Donald Trump’s ire, said during a court hearing that a recent whistleblower complaint had strengthened the argument that Trump administration officials engaged in criminal contempt of court by failing to bring deportation flights back to the United States.

Boasberg also raised the prospect of referring Justice Department lawyers to state bar associations, which have the authority to discipline attorneys for unethical conduct.

“I will certainly be assessing whether government counsel’s conduct and veracity to the court warrant a referral to state bars or our grievance committee, which determines lawyers’ fitness to practice in our court,” Boasberg said.

A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment.

Boasberg has been hearing an American Civil Liberties Union lawsuit brought on behalf of alleged Venezuelan gang members removed from the United States under a rarely invoked 18th-century law. The detainees in the case were returned to Venezuela last week as part of a prisoner exchange, after spending four months in El Salvador’s CECOT prison.

The migrants’ lawyers have disputed the gang membership claims and said their clients were not given a chance to contest the government’s assertions.

Boasberg said in April that the Trump administration appeared to have acted “in bad faith” when it hurriedly assembled three deportation flights on March 15 at the same time that he was conducting emergency court proceedings to assess the legality of the effort.

In court filings, Justice Department lawyers have disputed that they disobeyed a court order, saying remarks Boasberg made from the bench were not legally binding.

In a 2-1 order, a federal appeals court in April temporarily paused Boasberg’s effort to investigate whether the Trump administration engaged in criminal contempt.

Boasberg said during Thursday’s hearing that the delay from the appeals court was frustrating for the plaintiffs, and that a whistleblower complaint from Erez Reuveni, a former Justice Department attorney who was fired in April, strengthened the contempt case.

Reuveni described three separate incidents when Justice Department leaders defied court orders related to the deportation of immigrants living in the country without legal status.

Attorney General Pam Bondi in a post on X called Reuveni a “disgruntled employee” and a “leaker.”

Source: Usatoday.com | View original article

Source: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/07/24/judge-weighs-doj-discipline-venezuelan-deportations/85361992007/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *