After long dismissing global alarm about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, Israeli officials have shifted in recent days to acknowledging that a degree of hunger has crept into the Strip.

But while certain areas of the war-town enclave are lacking food, this is because the United Nations has failed to distribute hundreds of pallets of aid that are sitting at the Gaza border, Israel claims.

A senior officer from Israel’s Coordinator for Government Activities in the Territories even brought journalists to the Gazan side of the Strip’s Kerem Shalom crossing on Friday, where he declared that aid piling up there was “due to a lack of cooperation from the international community and international organizations.”

David Satterfield, who served as the US humanitarian envoy during the early months of the Gaza war, hit back at the Israeli claim in a recent interview.

“It is disingenuous — knowingly false — for any party to assert that it is failure, lack of courage, or deliberate conspiratorial withholding of aid by the UN or international organizations that is responsible for the humanitarian suffering in Gaza,” Satterfield said.

Get The Times of Israel’s Daily Edition by email and never miss our top stories Newsletter email address Get it By signing up, you agree to the terms

When aid transport roads become too badly damaged by Israeli military operations, when there are insufficient deconfliction mechanisms in place to ensure that aid workers don’t accidentally get hit by IDF fire, when authorizations aren’t given by the army for aid to be picked up and delivered, and when looting becomes increasingly widespread due to food insecurity, an environment is created where the UN is physically prevented from doing its job, the former US envoy explained.

While still blaming the UN, Israel appeared to tacitly recognize its own complicity in the humanitarian crisis on Saturday, by announcing a series of steps to alleviate the situation, including establishing new corridors for the UN to safely deliver aid, instituting humanitarian pauses to its military operations in densely populated areas, reconnecting the power line to Gaza’s only desalination plant, and launching its own airdrops of food and medicine for the first time.

Although those steps are critical, Satterfield maintained that if they’re not fused with a broader surge of aid into the Strip from as many crossings as possible, the hunger crisis will not be fully mitigated.

Advertisement

Desperation breeds violence

Since Israel lifted its aid blockade in late May after 78 days, assistance has primarily been delivered through the newly-established Gaza Humanitarian Foundation and existing mechanisms operated by the UN and international organizations.

Both mechanisms have been prone to violence, with UN trucks repeatedly looted by thousands of desperate Palestinians, unsure when they’ll receive their next meal for themselves and their families.

GHF boasts that it manages to transport aid to distribution sites without facing the same violence, but that is because it is delivering assistance through areas that the IDF has largely cleared of Palestinians.

Moreover, while trucks haven’t been looted en route to GHF sites, the scenes at those sites aren’t radically different from those at looted UN convoys, where aid workers fall back to allow thousands to frantically rummage through boxes of assistance, rather than try to distribute it in an orderly fashion.

GHF has also faced criticism for forcing Palestinians to walk long distances, often coming under deadly fire when crossing IDF lines to pick up aid.

“You have a population in desperate straits — more desperate than at any point since the October 7 massacre and when the initial cut-off of assistance began,” Satterfield said.

Advertisement

That desperation breeds violence — either from civilians themselves who don’t comply with directives aimed at ensuring an orderly distribution process, and who then have faced gunfire from what reports have indicated are trigger-happy Israeli soldiers or American contractors.

The other form of violence has come from criminal gangs or Hamas operatives, whom the IDF accuses of trying to induce chaotic scenes near aid distribution sites.

‘Flooding the zone’

“There is an established, proven way of confronting and overcoming these problems, and it has been demonstrated repeatedly in Gaza since the Fall of 2023, which is to ‘flood the zone,’” Satterfield said. “You deliver assistance at scale and you do so on a sustained basis to wherever populations are present.”

Giving a rough estimate, the former US humanitarian envoy said at least 350 trucks of aid need to come through multiple crossings each day.

Since Israel partially lifted its aid blockade on May 19, an average of just about 70 aid trucks have entered Gaza each day.

Even if Israel reaches the 350 mark, Satterfield explained that there still will be an initial period of looting that could last up to two weeks until Palestinians have more confidence that they will be able to continue securing food for their families in the future.

Moreover, looting carried out for purposes of commoditization will also dissipate because the value of assistance in the marketplace will drop due to the rise in supply.

“This is not theory. It’s what happens,” Satterfield said.

Advertisement

While the UN has refused to cooperate with GHF, arguing that the US- and Israeli-backed organization is a tool of the Israeli government to displace and endanger Palestinians, the former US envoy argued that the GHF can and should continue to operate as an additive to international organizations in a “flood the zone” scenario.

UN risk calculus

Addressing the Israeli criticism of the UN for not adequately picking up aid that has amassed at Gaza crossings, Satterfield agreed with the UN retort that the Kerem Shalom and Zikim platforms at the Gaza border are not “McDonald’s drive-throughs” that can be accessed at will.

Moreover, aid transport routes, which became complex and difficult to maneuver once the war started, have become severely damaged since the IDF’s May 2024 takeover of the southern Gaza city of Rafah.

“The high level of civilian unrest, lack of law and order, the presence of gangs and criminal elements and a desperate population makes movement off these platforms exceedingly difficult,” Satterfield said. “Deconfliction and coordination with the IDF is a complicated process in itself, as most moves by the humanitarian community require explicit approval from the IDF regarding timing and routes.”

The UN and international organizations take all of these factors into consideration when assessing their ability to pick up aid from the Kerem Shalom platform in south Gaza and the Zikim platform in north Gaza.

They are not risk-averse and are willing to put their staff in a high degree of danger in order to deliver aid, Satterfield said, noting that some of those workers have even lost their lives in the process.

“They only halt movements when they believe they would put their trucks and their drivers into absolutely certain harm’s way,” the former US humanitarian envoy maintained.

Satterfield pointed out that the past week isn’t the first time that Israel highlighted the large quantity of aid at the Gaza border that isn’t picked up, adding that the pallets at earlier points in the war reached over 1,500 truckloads.

Advertisement

“It’s not the tragic fact of starvation and deprivation that drives movement off the platforms,” he said. “It is the physical ability to [transport]… without violence. That’s always been the calculus.”

Is Hamas stealing aid?

Over the weekend, The New York Times — citing two senior military officials — reported that Israel has never found evidence that Hamas has “systemically” stolen aid from the UN. The IDF denied the story.

For his part, Satterfield said “there’s no question” that the terror group has worked to take “political advantage and certainly some physical substantive advantage out of the aid distribution process.”

Hamas operatives have made a point of “flaunting” their presence at aid sites in a message to Palestinians that the terror group has no intention of ceding its role in the distribution process.

However, Satterfield maintained that “the bulk of all assistance delivered by the UN and by the international organizations has gone to the population of Gaza and not to Hamas. Full stop.”

The former US envoy made an exception for aid delivered by the Egyptian and Palestinian branches of the Red Crescent, which has “zero international accountability,” exposing the organization’s trucks to a much higher degree of Hamas diversion.

Notably, Red Crescent trucks were among those seen entering Gaza on Sunday as Israel took steps to increase aid entering the Strip. The organization did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Satterfield said Red Crescent aid is distinct from assistance from the UN, which is accountable to funding states, including the US.

“This doesn’t mean assistance hasn’t gone to Hamas. It has. Or that that’s a bad thing. It is. Or that withholding all assistance hurts Hamas. It does. But it hurts Israel more because of the international opprobrium and the ultimate strategic inelasticity for Israel of this situation — of two million people suffering and now starving,” the former US envoy argued.

Headlines shouldn’t shape policy, but mainstream media reports about mounting hunger “are not the product of journalist invention or Hamas propaganda,” Satterfield said.

“The problem Israel confronts is real and must be dealt with in the manner that proved relatively successful in the past. That means ‘flood the zone’ with assistance,” he asserted.

Former US secretary of state Hillary Clinton tears into the pro-Palestinian protest movement that has swept across American colleges, calling them ignorant and lamenting that they’re being misinformed by propaganda on social media and in the classroom.

“I have had many conversations with a lot of young people over the last many months. They don’t know very much at all about the history of the Middle East or frankly about history in many areas of the world, including in our own country,” Clinton tells MSNBC’s Morning Joe.

“With respect to the Middle East, they don’t know that under the bringing together of the Israelis and the Palestinians by my husband — then-Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak, the then-head of the Palestinian Liberation Organization Yasser Arafat — an offer was made to the Palestinians for a state on 96% of the existing territory occupied by the Palestinians with 4% of Israel to be given to reach 100% of the amount of territory that was hoped for.”

“This offer was made and if Yasser Arafat had accepted it there would have been a Palestinian state now for about 24 years. It’s one of the great tragedies of history that he was unable to say, ‘yes,’” Clinton laments.

“My husband has a book coming out later this year in which he talks about how Arafat kept saying that he intended to agree, he wanted to agree, but he was pretty sure he’d be killed because Sadat was killed by extremists when he made peace with Israel. Our dear, dear friend, Yitzhak Rabin was killed by a radical Israeli when he was pursuing the two-state solution.”

“This is a very important piece of history to understand if you’re going to take any kind of position regarding what’s going on right now,” the former US secretary of state says.

Turning to how these far-left college students have been misinformed, Clinton says they are being fed “propaganda” instead of receiving an education.

“Anybody who is teaching in a university or anyone who is putting content on social media should be held responsible for what they include and what they exclude. So much of what we’re seeing, particularly on TikTok, about what’s going on in the Middle East is willfully false, but it’s also incredibly slanted, pro-Hamas, anti-Israel.”

“It is not any place where anyone should go to get information about complex matters like what is going on there… People are on social media oftentimes to press an ideological, religious, financial or partisan political agenda. You don’t get the facts, you don’t get any kind of context.”

“We have to do a better job… with young people in trying to help them understand how to filter and interpret the information they’re getting.”

“We also need to do a better job in our classrooms, particularly at the college or university level, not to fall into easy absolutes — you’re either for or against. Life is too complicated, history certainly is.”