Russia's Eurovision Rip-Off Exposes Kremlin's Delusions of Cultural Grandeur
Russia's Eurovision Rip-Off Exposes Kremlin's Delusions of Cultural Grandeur

Russia’s Eurovision Rip-Off Exposes Kremlin’s Delusions of Cultural Grandeur

How did your country report this? Share your view in the comments.

Diverging Reports Breakdown

Russia’s Eurovision Rip-Off Exposes Kremlin’s Delusions of Cultural Grandeur

Russia staged the Intervision contest, which Moscow proudly declared to be the heir to the musical events held irregularly since 1965 in the countries of the socialist bloc. Claiming someone else’s achievements is nothing new. But during wartime, a propaganda spectacle with the participation of the few who either dared or had no choice but to attend looked like a staged self-exposure rather than triumph. The winner of a contest in the land of “traditional values” turns out to be a young, openly gay Vietnamese man in a dress. The U.S. ended up represented only by a jury member — hard rock vocalist Joe Lynn Turner, married to a Belarusian and living long stretches outside Minsk. It was exactly like the Olympics, which never quite catapulted Russia to the heights it imagines itself. The main theme of the contest was “peace,” which was uttered more often than necessary on Russian television in a country waging war against NATO “Ukrainian fascists”

Read full article ▼
Late in the evening on Sept. 20, Russia staged the Intervision contest, which Moscow proudly declared to be the heir to the musical events held irregularly since 1965 in the countries of the socialist bloc, with the participation of the U.S.S.R. Claiming someone else’s achievements is nothing new. But during wartime, a propaganda spectacle with the participation of the few who either dared or had no choice but to attend looked like a staged self-exposure rather than triumph. What can one say, when the winner of a contest in the land of “traditional values” turns out to be a young, openly gay Vietnamese man in a dress? And this, pardon the expression, Duc Phuc even bonded with the Belarusian entrant, Nastya Kravchenko, gifting her a Vietnamese hat with her portrait on it (though he gave similar gifts to every contestant). The Vietnamese, it seems, did their homework and charmed everyone in the room. And before the jury knew it, Phuc was on the winner’s pedestal — when really, in the eyes of pro-war patriots, he belongs behind bars! Things also went awry with the United States — Russia’s tactical trump card in this whole story. First, Brandon Howard, known mostly for speculation about his possible kinship with Michael Jackson, refused to come. He helpfully announced that Vassy — the Greek-Australian singer Vassiliki Karagiorgos — would perform instead. But after the Australian authorities sent her an “official note” as a citizen of that country, Plan B also fell through. The audience had to be told about “unprecedented political pressure,” and the U.S. ended up represented only by a jury member — hard rock vocalist Joe Lynn Turner, a noted fan of President Vladimir Putin and his Belarusian counterpart Alexander Lukashenko, married to a Belarusian and living long stretches outside Minsk. Otherwise, Russia would have faced embarrassment with Vassy too: she’s a longtime activist and a supporter of LGBTQ+ rights (which Russia still thinks is some kind of movement worth suppressing). The geographic scatter of participants provoked grand statements. For example, TV host Yana Churikova said two hours before the show that the “whole planet Earth” was represented, to which host Dmitry Borisov happily confirmed: “Twenty countries!” There were actually 22 participants, once the United States dropped out. Incidentally, from hostile Europe, only three out of a possible 44 countries took part in Intervision. Out of 35 countries in the Americas, four participated. Africa also sent four, while Asia provided an impressive nine, including the eternal vassals of the former U.S.S.R., supplying the desired sense of closeness.

Russia desperately wants to live in this world, practically with its last strength, since tourism to Europe is only just beginning to grow, with a potential visa embargo threatening it. But even aside from the meager tourism, everything in Russia looks like ersatz Europe: from endless Anglicisms in speech and urban design to the nearby Skolkovo business school and the light show that served one obvious purpose — to mock Eurovision, which remains a thorn in the side of Russian patriots no matter how loudly they profess loyalty to India and China. Beyond a few large countries like Brazil, nominally able to provide an audience, the rest fell into the category of dependent clients. Russia, with its self-important pout, cosplayed the “great Soviet power” once surrounded by various Third World countries while playing the anti-Western imperialism card. The current rulers couldn’t invent anything new. Neither could the organizers of the contest, which was staged under slogans of “peace in the whole world” — words that, in the current context, would almost qualify as “discrediting the army.” “Intervision,” a smooth baritone with a faintly streetwise intonation explains in promotional clips on Channel One, “is not just about music; it’s about uniting peoples and friendship among nations, about culture without borders, about emotions everyone can understand.” The screen flashes scenes of Moscow — Red Square, VDNKh, Luzhniki stadium. Against this backdrop, people of all colors sang “Kalinka.” It was exactly like the Olympics, the World Youth Festivals and other staged celebrations from which never quite catapulted Russia to the heights it imagiens for itself. A parade of unknowns — random foreigners and mostly hired migrant workers dressed in costumes evoking various corners of the globe. Although the word “peace” was uttered more often than necessary on a Russian television show in a country waging war against NATO via “Ukrainian fascists,” the contest itself avoided such slips. The main theme of the songs was love, which — as we know — only blossoms in wartime, born of longing, hunger, despair and hopelessness. The main object of the carefully staged comment was, without question, a man with the militaristic surname Dronov, better known by his stage name Shaman. In one of his speeches before his eccentric performance, he made a telling slip of the tongue, referring to the participating countries as “all 23 republics.” After all, harkening back to the Soviet Union is as necessary to today’s Russia as air. Without it — like without Putin — the country is doomed. Or so think those who are now irreparably ruining the country’s karma. From the very first notes of the bombastic show, it was clear everything was going according to plan. Before the contestants, Dima Bilan and Polina Gagarina sang a song that once thrilled Soviet teens during perestroika. “Na Zare” (“At Dawn”) — the great hit by the band Alyans — was easily turned into a syrupy ballad. It served as a prelude to the propaganda simulation of a contest, staged to demonstrate Russia’s victory. But even that picture was enough to show how Russia can come away with some kind of victory.

Source: Themoscowtimes.com | View original article

Source: https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2025/09/25/russias-eurovision-rip-off-exposes-kremlins-delusions-of-cultural-grandeur-a90622

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *