
SC junks Delhi Waqf Board’s plea claiming rights on property
How did your country report this? Share your view in the comments.
Diverging Reports Breakdown
SC junks Delhi Waqf Board’s plea claiming rights on property
Delhi Waqf Board claimed that a property in Shahdara area in the capital was a ” waqf property ” Board said a Gurudwara was functioning there since long. apex court was hearing the board’s plea challenging a September 2010 order of the Delhi High Court which dismissed its suit for possession of the property.
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
The Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a plea by the Delhi Waqf Board which claimed that a property in Shahdara area in the capital was a ” waqf property ” and said a Gurudwara was functioning there since long.”There is a Gurudwara, let it be. Even if there is any claim, you should relinquish that claim saying a Gurudwara is already there,” a bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Satish Chandra Sharma told the counsel appearing for the Delhi Waqf Board.The apex court was hearing the board’s plea challenging a September 2010 order of the Delhi High Court , which dismissed its suit for possession of the property.The suit alleged that the property in question was a waqf property, being used as a waqf since time immemorial.The apex court, however, said, “There is a Gurudwara functioning out there.”The waqf board counsel referred to the findings of the trial judge in the matter and said a mosque existed there.He said one of the witness of the defendant himself admitted that there was a mosque and “some kind of a Gurudwara” was made there but it was not registered.”Not some kind of a Gurudwara, it is a fully functional Gurudwara,” the bench said.Dismissing the plea, the top court referred to the high court’s order observing one of the witnesses admitted that the Gurudwara was functioning in the property since 1947.
Let the gurdwara be: SC junks Delhi Waqf Board’s plea claiming rights on property
The Supreme Court dismissed a plea by the Delhi Waqf Board. The board claimed possession of a property on which a gurdwara is located. The apex court rejected the board’s contention that the property in question was waqf. The SC was hearing the board’s petition challenging a September 2010 Delhi High Court order, which rejected its suit for possession of the property.
Advertisement
“There is a gurdwara, let it be. Even if there is any claim, you should relinquish that claim saying a gurdwara is already there,” a bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Satish Chandra Sharma told the Delhi Waqf Board counsel who argued for possession of the gurdwara property.
The SC was hearing the board’s petition challenging a September 2010 Delhi High Court order, which rejected its suit for possession of the stated property. The Board submitted that the property in question was a waqf property and had been in use as a waqf since time immemorial.
Advertisement
Arguing for the board, the counsel flagged findings of a trial judge that a mosque existed there.
The counsel further argued that one of the defendant himself admitted that there was a mosque and “some kind of a gurdwara” which was not registered.
Advertisement
The SC in its orders dismissing the board’s petition today said, “Not some kind of a gurdwara, it is a fully functional gurudwara.”
The apex court highlighted the high court’s orders noting the functioning of a gurdwara at the contested property since 1947.