Italy votes on speeding up citizenship for foreigners
How did your country report this? Share your view in the comments.
Diverging Reports Breakdown
Italy’s Landmark Vote to Accelerate Foreign Citizenship Sparks Global Interest and Debate
Italy is voting on a referendum to ease citizenship requirements for foreigners, a divisive issue impacting the country’s immigration policies. Advocates argue it will foster inclusivity, while opponents fear it may dilute national identity. Will this vote pave the way for a more inclusive society, or will it reinforce existing divisions? The future of Italian citizenship hangs in the balance.
www.ft.com
Italy votes on speeding up citizenship for foreigners, a crucial referendum that could reshape the nation’s immigration policies. Scheduled for June 8, 2025, this vote has sparked intense debate across the country.
5 Key Takeaways Italy votes on citizenship for foreigners
Citizenship referendum polarizes public opinion
Easing citizenship rules under discussion
Italians prepare for citizenship voting
Reversal of labor reform on the ballot
With the potential to ease citizenship requirements, the referendum has polarized public opinion. Advocates argue it will foster inclusivity, while opponents fear it may dilute national identity. How will this decision affect Italy’s future?
Fast Answer: Italy’s upcoming referendum on citizenship could significantly impact immigration policies, reflecting broader global Italy’s upcoming referendum on citizenship could significantly impact immigration policies, reflecting broader global Trends in nationality and integration.
This referendum raises essential questions about national identity and the role of immigration in Italy. As citizens prepare to cast their votes, key points emerge:
Supporters believe easing citizenship will boost the economy.
Opponents worry about cultural dilution and social cohesion.
The outcome may influence similar debates in other European nations.
The global relevance of this referendum highlights the ongoing struggle between national identity and multiculturalism.
As Italy stands at this crossroads, the world watches closely. Will this vote pave the way for a more inclusive society, or will it reinforce existing divisions? The future of Italian citizenship hangs in the balance.
Mr Darcy and the Mandela effect
The famous scene in Pride and Prejudice is nothing more than a figment of our collective hot-blooded imagination. Do you remember when Walkers changed the colour of its salt & vinegar crisp packets from blue to green — and vice versa for cheese & onion? Or do you remember the cornucopia behind the fruit on the logo of the clothing brand Fruit of the Loom? If so, you have succumbed to what is known as the “Mandela effect’. Once we have exaggerated or approximated a story enough times, that becomes our “truth’s ‘true’ state. This works on a collective level too: psychologists explain that the Mandela effect happens through a combination of emotional bias, the consumption of misinformation on the internet and in the media, psychological priming and the need to make sense of things. As an eternal optimist, I am going to go with the latter and hold on to my dripping Darcy memory in my heart. But will fact and fiction seem so so much so that truth is no longer valued?
So iconic is the scene that a giant floating statue was erected in its honour in the middle of the Serpentine Lake in London in 2013, with Darcy shown waist deep in the water, his rippling muscles visible underneath his sodden shirt. The Guardian was one of many newspapers to cover its unveiling, describing the sculpture as a celebration of “the notorious scene . . . in which Colin Firth as Mr Darcy emerges wet-shirted and dripping from the lake of his country estate”. A video news segment on the statue described the moment that “saw Firth wade out of a lake”.
But here’s a funny thing: this scene does not actually exist. I discovered this when trying to find the original footage for a recent feature. We never see Mr Darcy getting out of the lake at all; we see him diving into the water in his clothes, and then in the next shot he is walking along solid ground — slightly damp, yes, but certainly not dripping. This “memorable” scene, in other words, is nothing more than a figment of our collective hot-blooded imagination (as Firth himself once had to point out).
And this is not the only thing we have dreamt up en masse. Do you remember when Walkers changed the colour of its salt & vinegar crisp packets from blue to green — and vice versa for cheese & onion? Do you remember when the “KitKat” logo was hyphenated? Do you remember the cornucopia behind the fruit on the logo of the clothing brand Fruit of the Loom? If so, you have succumbed to what is known as the “Mandela effect”.
This term is credited to “paranormal researcher” Fiona Broome. She coined it in 2010 when large numbers of people on the internet were claiming to have remembered the anti-apartheid activist turned South African president Nelson Mandela having died in prison during the 1980s. He was in fact still alive.
In psychological terms, it is what we might call a collective confabulation: an unintentionally distorted or fabricated memory of something that the (mis)rememberer feels confident about — even when shown evidence that contradicts it. Research has shown that memories are not static or fixed, but instead formed by the so-called “rehearsing” of a story over and over, to ourselves and to others. Once we have exaggerated or approximated a story enough times, that becomes our “truth”.
This works on a collective level too: psychologists explain that the Mandela effect happens through a combination of emotional bias, the consumption of misinformation on the internet and in the media, psychological priming and the need to make sense of things.
There are many reasonable explanations for most of the examples I cite. It is likely that the death of Mandela was conflated with that of another anti-apartheid activist named Steve Biko, about whom a popular movie had been made. With Darcy, our false memory is probably a result both of our filling in the gaps in the story, and of the repetition of the made-up scene in the media. The first mention I could find of Darcy’s emerging “dripping” wet from the lake was in The Independent in 1995, soon after the series’ release; it has subsequently been repeated in several hundred articles.
But some things are less easy to explain away by simple psychology: the fact-checking website Snopes last year published an exhaustive inquiry into whether or not a cornucopia had ever featured in the Fruit of the Loom logo and found it never had. Where did that idea come from? Is this evidence of a glitch in the Matrix? Those of you who spend any time on online forums will not be surprised to hear that many denizens of the internet think it constitutes evidence of parallel universes.
As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly sophisticated, what might be the implications for our memories? Will it become harder to prove the “real” version of events when false versions seem so genuine? Will fact and fiction blur to the extent that truth is no longer valued?
Or, conversely, could AI help us weed out fakery and historical revisionism via some kind of superintelligent fact-checking system, and reestablish in our collective consciousness memories of the truth? As an eternal optimist, I am going to go with the latter. But I will also hold on to my memory of Darcy in his dripping wet shirt, thanks.
jemima.kelly@ft.com
Italy’s citizenship referendum: What’s at stake?
Immigration has emerged as a key issue, particularly in Western Europe as well as the U.S. under President Donald Trump. Immigration has garnered plenty of attention in a nation where concerns over the scale of immigration helped propel right-wing Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s anti-migration coalition to power in late 2022. The question on the ballot paper asks Italians if they back reducing the period of residence required to apply for Italian citizenship, by naturalisation, from 10 years to five. The vote comes as Meloni has tightened citizenship laws, making it hard for resident immigrants to obtain nationality. The change proposed would allow nearly 1.5 million foreigners to obtain citizenship immediately, according to an Italian research centre. That would include nearly 300,000 minors, who would obtain citizenship if their parents did. The country needs to attract more foreigners to boost its anaemic economy, economists say. It also needs to make it harder to fire workers and increase compensation for those laid off by small businesses, reversing a previous law passed by a centre-left government.
The fate of millions of immigrants is at stake as Italians vote in a two-day referendum that proposes to speed up the process of acquiring citizenship for foreigners who legally entered the country.
The referendum also seeks to roll back labour reforms to provide enhanced job protections.
Polling stations opened on Sunday at 7am local time (05:00 GMT), with results expected after polls close on Monday at 3pm (13:00 GMT).
The measures – backed by opposition parties, labour unions and social activists – are aimed at revising citizenship laws to help second-generation Italians born in the country, to non-European Union parents, integrate more easily.
However, the vote may fail to generate sufficient turnout to be deemed valid – a turnout of more than 50 percent is required for a referendum to be legally binding.
Ahead of this weekend’s vote, the citizenship issue has garnered plenty of attention in a nation where concerns over the scale of immigration helped propel right-wing Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s anti-migration coalition to power in late 2022. Immigration has emerged as a key issue, particularly in Western Europe as well as the United States under President Donald Trump.
Advertisement
So, what does the referendum propose, and what does it mean for immigrants whose lives are in limbo due to the slow process of naturalisation in the EU member nation?
What are the Italian citizenship requirements, and how many immigrants are waiting for citizenship?
The question on the ballot paper asks Italians if they back reducing the period of residence required to apply for Italian citizenship, by naturalisation, from 10 years to five.
The change proposed by the referendum would allow nearly 1.5 million foreigners to obtain citizenship immediately, according to an estimate by Idos, an Italian research centre. That would include nearly 300,000 minors, who would obtain citizenship if their parents did.
About half of Italy’s 5.4 million foreign residents could be eligible to apply for citizenship if the vote is passed.
The vote comes as Meloni has tightened citizenship laws, making it hard for resident immigrants to obtain nationality.
Currently, immigrants from countries outside the EU can apply for citizenship only after 10 years of uninterrupted residency in Italy.
What is more, the children of lawful immigrants can apply for passports only once they have turned 18 and if they have continuously lived in the country since birth.
On the other hand, generous bloodline laws allowed people of Italian descent, even if remote, to obtain citizenship, helping maintain a link with the diaspora.
Advertisement
Between 2016 and 2023, for instance, Italy granted citizenship to more than 98,300 people, mostly living in Latin America, based on their claims of Italian ancestry.
With Italy’s birthrate in sharp decline, economists say the country needs to attract more foreigners to boost its anaemic economy.
Francesco Galietti, from political risk firm Policy Sonar, told the Reuters news agency that keeping such rules tight was “an identity issue” for Meloni, but she was also being pushed by businesses to open up the borders of an ageing country to foreign workers.
“On the one hand, there is the cultural identity rhetoric, but on the other, there are potential problems paying pensions and an economy that relies on manufacturing, which needs workers,” Galietti said.
For context, Italy’s constitution allows citizens to repeal laws through referendums, part of the system of checks and balances devised after Benito Mussolini’s fascist rule in the 1940s.
What are the other proposals in the referendum?
The referendum seeks to make it harder to fire workers and increase compensation for those laid off by small businesses, reversing a previous law passed by a centre-left government a decade ago.
One of the questions on the ballot also addresses the urgent issue of security at work, restoring joint liability to both contractors and subcontractors for workplace injuries.
Campaigners gathered more than 4.5 million signatures, according to the Italian General Confederation of Labour (CGIL) union, far more than needed to trigger the referendum, which will comprise five questions – four on the labour market and one on citizenship.
Advertisement
“We want to reverse a culture that has prioritised the interests of business over those of workers,” CGIL general secretary Maurizio Landini told the AFP news agency.
Who backed the referendum and why?
The referendum was promoted by a coalition of relatively small political parties – More Europe, Possibile, the Italian Socialist Party, the Italian Radicals and the Communist Refoundation Party – and numerous civil society associations.
It is also being backed by the centre-left Democratic Party, which is jockeying for Italian citizenship laws to be more aligned with EU-wide standards.
Research shows that access to citizenship has positive causal effects.
Immigrants who naturalise experience lower unemployment rates, earn higher incomes and are less likely to be overqualified for their jobs.
By contrast, protracted waiting periods for naturalisation delay or dampen these effects.
These findings support the claim that naturalisation is not only a reward, but also an important catalyst for integration.
The majority of Italians think that citizenship accelerates the integration process as well.
The last Eurobarometer on the integration of immigrants reports that 87 percent of Italians believe that acquiring citizenship is an important factor for the successful integration of immigrants in Italy.
Advertisement
Even if it passes, however, the reform will not affect the law many consider deeply unfair – that children born in Italy to foreign parents cannot request nationality until they reach 18.
Does PM Meloni back the new citizenship rules?
Opposition left-wing and centrist parties, civil society groups and a leading trade union have latched on to the issues of labour rights and Italy’s demographic woes as a way of challenging Meloni’s right-wing coalition government.
Meloni has said she would show up at the polls but not cast a ballot – a move widely criticised by the left as antidemocratic, since it will not help reach the necessary threshold to make the vote valid.
Activists and opposition parties have denounced the lack of public debate on the measures, accusing the governing centre-right coalition of trying to dampen interest in sensitive issues that directly affect immigrants and workers.
A Demopolis institute poll last month estimated turnout would be in the range of 31-39 percent among Italy’s roughly 50 million electors, well short of the required threshold.
Leaders of two of the governing coalition’s right-wing parties, Antonio Tajani of Forza Italia and Matteo Salvini of the League, have opposed the vote.
The referendum is “dangerous” and would extend access to citizenship “indiscriminately”, Salvini, Italy’s deputy prime minister, said in May.
How significant is the referendum?
Supporters say this reform would bring Italy’s citizenship law in line with many other European countries, promoting greater social integration for long-term residents.
Advertisement
It would also allow faster access to civil and political rights, such as the right to vote, eligibility for public employment and freedom of movement within the EU.
Italy is also confronting one of Europe’s most acute demographic crises.
Its population is ageing rapidly, with about a quarter of Italians aged above 65 years and just 12 percent aged 14 or younger. The referendum could ease some of these pressures.