Round 1 – Pick 1 Cooper Flagg SF Duke • Fr • 6’8″ / 221 lbs Projected Team Dallas PROSPECT RNK 1st POSITION RNK 1st PPG 19.2 RPG 7.5 APG 4.2 3P% 38.5% For more than a year, there’s never really been any doubt about which player will go No. 1 in the 2025 NBA Draft. It was always going to be Flagg, the one-and-done star at Duke who led the Blue Devils in all five major individual categories while becoming the youngest Wooden Award winner in history. High ceiling. High floor. It’s hard to imagine Flagg not being a high-level NBA player for more than a decade.

Round 1 – Pick 2 Dylan Harper PG Rutgers • Fr • 6’5″ / 213 lbs Projected Team San Antonio PROSPECT RNK 2nd POSITION RNK 1st PPG 19.4 RPG 4.6 APG 4 3P% 33.3% Harper is the consensus No. 2 prospect in this draft and thus should be the second player selected even if he’s not a perfect fit on a roster already featuring De’Aaron Fox and reigning Rookie of the Year Stephon Castle. As others have noted, that could lead to San Antonio shopping the pick to franchises more in need of a lead guard with nice positional size. So keep an eye on that. Either way, no matter which franchise selects second, Harper is likely to be the pick.

Round 1 – Pick 3 Tre Johnson SG Texas • Fr • 6’5″ / 190 lbs Projected Team Philadelphia PROSPECT RNK 5th POSITION RNK 2nd PPG 19.9 RPG 3.1 APG 2.7 3P% 39.7% Some believe Philadelphia could move this pick for a veteran given where former MVP Joel Embiid is in his career. That’s understandable. But if the Sixers do execute the pick, they shouldn’t let the presence of talented young guards like Tyrese Maxey and Jared McCain on their roster steer them away from Johnson, the player I believe is the third best prospect available. The one-and-done standout from Texas led all freshmen in scoring while shooting 39.7% from 3-point range on 6.8 attempts per contest. Impressive numbers, all around. And most of them are the type of numbers that should translate to the next level.

Round 1 – Pick 4 VJ Edgecombe SG Baylor • Fr • 6’4″ / 193 lbs Projected Team Charlotte PROSPECT RNK 4th POSITION RNK 1st PPG 15 RPG 5.6 APG 3.2 3P% 34% The Hornets went from having as good of odds as anybody to land Flagg and keep him 150 miles from where he starred at Duke to sliding to fourth in this draft. That’s bad luck. But they’ll still have an opportunity to land a difference-maker — among them Edgecombe, who is a top-shelf and explosive athlete capable of creating posters in transition. He’s the type of prospect who is both safe and filled with upside after helping Baylor make what was a sixth straight trip to the NCAA Tournament.

Round 1 – Pick 5 Ace Bailey SF Rutgers • Fr • 6’8″ / 203 lbs Projected Team Utah PROSPECT RNK 3rd POSITION RNK 2nd PPG 17.6 RPG 7.2 APG 1.3 3P% 34.6% More evidence that Rutgers should’ve been better than it was this past season is the fact that the Scarlet Knights finished with a losing record despite having two projected top-five picks. Is it concerning that Baily isn’t more well-rounded at this point in his development? Yes. But his upside is tremendous given that he’s an electric shot-creator and shot-maker. He checks the box of the best prospect available at this point in the draft and is a sensible option for a Utah franchise still rebuilding.

Round 1 – Pick 6 Jeremiah Fears PG Oklahoma • Fr • 6’3″ / 180 lbs Projected Team Washington PROSPECT RNK 7th POSITION RNK 2nd PPG 17.1 RPG 4.1 APG 4.1 3P% 28.4% Fears is set to join the relatively short list of one-and-done lottery picks who were ranked outside of the top 60 of their high school classes. His unique ability to change speeds and keep defenders off balance is too much to ignore even if his subpar 3-point percentage is a source of concern for some front offices.

Round 1 – Pick 7 Kon Knueppel SF Duke • Fr • 6’5″ / 219 lbs Projected Team New Orleans PROSPECT RNK 6th POSITION RNK 3rd PPG 14.4 RPG 4 APG 2.7 3P% 40.6% Knueppel was mostly excellent through Duke’s run to the Final Four, averaging 19.0 points while shooting 63.6% from beyond the arc. He’s an elite shooter, obviously, but far from only a shooter — and anybody labeling him as little more than a catch-and-shoot threat is wildly underestimating Knueppel’s versatility as a player who projects as a nice building block for a New Orleans franchise forever in search of floor-spacers to put alongside Zion Williamson.

Round 1 – Pick 8 Khaman Maluach C Duke • Fr • 7’1″ / 253 lbs Projected Team Brooklyn PROSPECT RNK 11th POSITION RNK 2nd PPG 8.6 RPG 6.6 APG 0.5 3P% 25% Maluach’s otherwise great freshman year concluded horribly with a zero-rebound effort in 21 minutes during Duke’s season-ending loss to Houston. But that was just one game against an older and stronger team, and it shouldn’t sour front offices too much on an 18 year-old who can move unusually well for a man his size.

Round 1 – Pick 9 Derik Queen C Maryland • Fr • 6’9″ / 248 lbs Projected Team Toronto PROSPECT RNK 10th POSITION RNK 1st PPG 16.5 RPG 9 APG 1.9 3P% 20% Queen is a super-interesting forward who offsets some of his physical limitations with incredible skill and above-average smarts. He hit the buzzer-beater against Colorado State that sent Maryland to the Sweet 16, scored 27 against the eventual national champion (Florida) and solidified himself in the NCAA Tournament as an intriguing lottery option.

From From Phoenix Suns Round 1 – Pick 10 Carter Bryant SF Arizona • Fr • 6’7″ / 215 lbs Projected Team Houston PROSPECT RNK 13th POSITION RNK 4th PPG 6.5 RPG 4.1 APG 1 3P% 37.1% The Rockets are a 52-win franchise with most of its important pieces under contract. They can afford to package this pick in a trade or use it on a high-upside prospect — and Bryant clearly represents the latter. These playoffs have reminded everybody how much great 3-and-D wings impact winning in the postseason. Bryant has the tools to become one and should be selected accordingly regardless of his limited role as a freshman at Arizona.

Round 1 – Pick 11 Jase Richardson SG Michigan State • Fr • 6’1″ / 178 lbs Projected Team Portland PROSPECT RNK 17th POSITION RNK 3rd PPG 12.1 RPG 3.3 APG 1.9 3P% 41.2% Richardson didn’t emerge as a starter at Michigan State until halfway through the season but quickly showed himself to be the team’s most dynamic scorer. He’s the son of 14-year NBA veteran Jason Richardson, which is viewed as a positive among NBA front offices. The combo guard is a high-energy prospect with the type of basketball IQ children of players often possess, and he should be a sensible option for a Portland franchise with promising frontcourt pieces already in place.

Round 1 – Pick 12 Collin Murray-Boyles PF South Carolina • Soph • 6’7″ / 239 lbs Projected Team Chicago PROSPECT RNK 8th POSITION RNK 1st PPG 16.8 RPG 8.3 APG 2.4 3P% 26.5% The Bulls were a below-average defensive team this past season. Murray-Boyles could help alleviate that issue. Yes, he’s a non-shooting and undersized front-court piece, which makes him a somewhat divisive prospect. But the two-year player from South Carolina is impactful in multiple ways on both ends of the court, and his feel for the game, instincts and defensive versatility have many evaluators on board with the 19 year-old being a lottery pick.

From From Sacramento Kings Round 1 – Pick 13 Kasparas Jakucionis PG Illinois • Fr • 6’5″ / 205 lbs Projected Team Atlanta PROSPECT RNK 9th POSITION RNK 3rd PPG 15 RPG 5.7 APG 4.7 3P% 31.8% What Jakucionis lacks in explosiveness he makes up for with his diverse skillset and high basketball IQ. The Lithuanian only shot 31.8% from 3-point range in one season at Illinois; that shouldn’t be ignored. But Jackucionis has previously shown to be a more reliable shooter than he largely demonstrated with the Illini and could develop into a nice piece who is capable of playing either behind or with Trae Young in Atlanta.

From From Atlanta Hawks Round 1 – Pick 14 Liam McNeeley SF UConn • Fr • 6’7″ / 215 lbs Projected Team San Antonio PROSPECT RNK 21st POSITION RNK 6th PPG 14.5 RPG 6 APG 2.3 3P% 31.7% It remains unclear if San Antonio will use both lottery picks or make move. As always, we’ll see. But if they do make this pick, McNeeley is a nice option. He only shot 31.7% from 3-point range in his one year at UConn — but scouts are largely unconcerned and still view him as a strong-shooting wing at the next level. An ankle sprain cost him more than a month of his season, but McNeeley showed enough while on the court to convince evaluators he’s worthy of being selected in the lottery.

From From Miami Heat Round 1 – Pick 15 Egor Demin PG BYU • Fr • 6’8″ / 199 lbs Projected Team Oklahoma City PROSPECT RNK 12th POSITION RNK 4th PPG 10.6 RPG 3.9 APG 5.5 3P% 27.3% Demin is a backcourt player with tremendous size — but one who turned it over 2.9 times per game this season, which should be at least a little concerning for franchises viewing him as a ball-in-his-hands guard. The 3-point percentage is also an issue. So it’s easy to understand why the one-and-done fresham from Russia is a divisive prospect, but there’s still little chance he goes much lower than the middle of the first round.

Round 1 – Pick 16 Nique Clifford SF Colorado State • Sr • 6’5″ / 202 lbs Projected Team Orlando PROSPECT RNK 15th POSITION RNK 5th PPG 18.9 RPG 9.6 APG 4.4 3P% 37.7% Clifford is older than the type of prospects some front offices prefer to select with top-20 picks — but he checks a lot of other boxes. Good positional size? Yes. Competent shooter? Yes. Versatile defender? Yes. He could be the next nice NBA player to emerge from the Mountain West Conference.

From From Detroit Pistons Round 1 – Pick 17 Danny Wolf PF Michigan • Jr • 6’11” / 252 lbs Projected Team Minnesota PROSPECT RNK 16th POSITION RNK 2nd PPG 13.2 RPG 9.7 APG 3.6 3P% 33.6% Wolf moved from the Ivy League to the Big Ten and, statistically, arguably performed even better. The 7-footer has guard skills and is a better defender than some realize. He could add frontcourt versatility to a Minnesota franchise that’s led by Anthony Edwards and set up to compete in the West for the foreseeable future.

From From Memphis Grizzlies Round 1 – Pick 18 Asa Newell PF Georgia • Fr • 6’9″ / 224 lbs Projected Team Washington PROSPECT RNK 20th POSITION RNK 3rd PPG 15.4 RPG 6.9 APG 0.9 3P% 29.2% Can Newell keep the floor spaced as a legitimate 3-point threat? If so, he should go higher. If not, he should go lower. Either way, that’s the swing-skill for the one-and-done prospect who performed quite well as a freshman in an SEC filled with much older and stronger forwards.

From From Milwaukee Bucks Round 1 – Pick 19 Nolan Traore PG France • 6’4″ / 175 lbs Projected Team Brooklyn PROSPECT RNK 14th POSITION RNK 5th PPG 12.3 RPG 1.9 APG 4.7 3P% 31.4% Traore does enough good things with the ball in his hands to secure a spot in the first round— but his inefficiency, and lack of shooting, are non-starters for some front offices. At 18, there are still many years of development for the French native. Any franchise selecting him has to do so with that understanding.

From From Golden State Warriors Round 1 – Pick 20 Noa Essengue PF France • 6’10” / 200 lbs Projected Team Miami PROSPECT RNK 22nd POSITION RNK 4th PPG 11.1 RPG 5.1 APG 1.2 3P% 26.7% Essengue is a French prospect with great positional size. As one of the youngest players available, he’s a long-term bet. But if the shot develops, and the defensive versatility becomes undeniable, the 18 year old could be a steal at this point in the draft for a Heat franchise seemingly at a crossroads after trading Jimmy Butler and getting swept out of the playoffs by a Cavs team that was subsequently eliminated by the Pacers in five games.

From From Minnesota Timberwolves Round 1 – Pick 21 Joan Beringer C France • 6’11” / 235 lbs Projected Team Utah PROSPECT RNK 27th POSITION RNK 5th PPG 5.4 RPG 4.9 APG 0.5 BPG 1.4 Beringer is a frontcourt prospect with a 7-4 wingspan who provides defensive versatility and the ability to rim-protect. Is he ready to contribute in the NBA next season? Probably not. But there’s a lot to like with this 18 year old who could be a building block for a Utah franchise still years away from competing for anything meaningful.

From From Los Angeles Lakers Round 1 – Pick 22 Cedric Coward SG Washington State • Sr • 6’5″ / 213 lbs Projected Team Atlanta PROSPECT RNK 18th POSITION RNK 4th PPG 17.7 RPG 7 APG 3.7 3P% 40% Coward committed to Duke before performing well at the combine, at which point he opted to remain in the draft. It looks like a wise decision for the 6-6 guard who shot 40% from 3-point range in six appearances for Washington State and was headed for an all-conference season until a shoulder injury sidelined him in late November.

Round 1 – Pick 23 Thomas Sorber C Georgetown • Fr • 6’9″ / 263 lbs Projected Team Indiana PROSPECT RNK 19th POSITION RNK 3rd PPG 14.5 RPG 8.5 APG 2.4 3P% 16.2% Sorber seemed ahead of schedule for a one-and-done prospect before suffering a season-ending left-foot injury on Feb. 15. Regardless, he did enough in 24 games to show he’d either spend next season as a Big East Player of the Year candidate or as a rookie in the NBA. The foot-injury is concerning, if only because big men with foot injuries don’t have the best stories. But Sorber should still go in the first round of this draft and could provide frontcourt depth for an Indiana franchise in the Eastern Conference Finals for the second straight year.

From From Los Angeles Clippers Round 1 – Pick 24 Ben Saraf PG Israel • 6’5″ / 200 lbs Projected Team Oklahoma City PROSPECT RNK 23rd POSITION RNK 6th PPG 12.5 RPG 2.7 APG 4.3 3P% 30.1% Saraf is another international prospect with nice positional size. Concerns about his shooting and athleticism should keep him out of the lottery — but there’s enough pick-and-roll playmaking ability already in place to ensure his name is called in this range — whether it’s to Oklahoma City at No. 24 or another franchise in this neighborhood of the draft.

From From Denver Nuggets Round 1 – Pick 25 Hugo Gonzalez SF Spain • 6’6″ / 205 lbs Projected Team Orlando PROSPECT RNK 29th POSITION RNK 8th Gonzalez hasn’t played or produced much for Real Madrid this season, which is mostly the byproduct of being a 19 year-old on a first-place team in a legitimate professional league. But the athleticism and high-motor that’s made him an intriguing prospect for years still exists and will likely be enough to get Gonzalez selected in the first round.

From From New York Knicks Round 1 – Pick 26 Will Riley SF Illinois • Fr • 6’8″ / 186 lbs Projected Team Brooklyn PROSPECT RNK 31st POSITION RNK 10th PPG 12.6 RPG 4.1 APG 2.2 3P% 32.6% Riley didn’t get as much attention as some other freshmen — but he was a reliable double-digit scorer for an NCAA Tournament team from start to finish. At Illinois, the long-and-lean wing showed playmaking ability. But the jumper is still more streaky than reliable, and he also needs to add strength.

From From Houston Rockets Round 1 – Pick 27 Maxime Raynaud C Stanford • Sr • 7’0″ / 237 lbs Projected Team Brooklyn PROSPECT RNK 25th POSITION RNK 4th PPG 20.2 RPG 10.6 APG 1.7 3P% 34.5% Raynaud improved statistically in four straight years at Stanford — going from somebody who averaged 4.5 points as a freshman to somebody who averaged 20.2 as a senior. His ability to stretch the floor and pass at his size are considered strengths and could be useful for a Brooklyn franchise that ranked 25th in 3-point shooting this season.

Round 1 – Pick 28 Rasheer Fleming PF Saint Joseph’s • Jr • 6’8″ / 232 lbs Projected Team Boston PROSPECT RNK 28th POSITION RNK 5th PPG 14.7 RPG 8.5 APG 1.3 3P% 39% The combine proved that Fleming is a little taller than 6-8 (barefoot) with a wingspan a little better than 7-5. Those measurements are great for somebody who also shot 39% from 3 on 4.5 attempts per game as a 20 year-old, and that’s among the reasons Fleming should go in the lottery despite mostly operating off of the national radar in three seasons at Saint Joseph’s.

From From Cleveland Cavaliers Round 1 – Pick 29 Walter Clayton Jr. PG Florida • Sr • 6’2″ / 199 lbs Projected Team Phoenix PROSPECT RNK 26th POSITION RNK 7th PPG 18.3 RPG 3.7 APG 4.2 3P% 38.6% Clayton was the star of Florida’s national title run while averaging 22.3 points on 43.5% shooting from beyond the arc in those six NCAA Tournament games. There are concerns about his decision-making and approach to defense, but the Most Outstanding Player of the 2025 Final Four is such a skilled and unique shotmaker that he’s worthy of a serious look this deep in the first round by a Phoenix franchise that probably needs to hit the reset button.