Trump will overshadow G7 even in his absence

Jessica Murphy

Reporting from the G7

Image source, EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

The skies over Kananaskis are sunny – and that’s the spin world leaders are putting on this last day of the G7 after the US president’s sudden exit last night.

Host Mark Carney, the Canadian prime minister, has said work must go on without Donald Trump.

He punctuated the point this morning by announcing C$4.3bn (£3.1bn) in new support for Ukraine while standing next to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Zelensky hopes to push the remaining leaders at the summit for more Russia sanctions, a suggestion Trump met with skepticism the day before.

Trump will also miss meetings with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum.

So whatever does come out of this summit will be looked at through the lens of Trump’s absence – and the fact much of the world attention has now shifted to Washington DC and the White House’s plans for the Iran-Israel conflict.

We are now pausing our live coverage of the G7 summit. You can stay across the latest developments in the Iran-Israel conflict here.

Starmer gives Zelensky ‘full backing’ in warm No 10 welcome

1 March 2025 Share Save Tom McArthur BBC News Share Save

Watch: Zelensky meets Starmer at Downing Street

Sir Keir Starmer has told Volodymyr Zelensky he has “full backing across the United Kingdom” as the two met in Downing Street. The Ukrainian president told the prime minister he was happy his country had “such friends” after arriving in the UK in the wake of a White House meeting with US President Donald Trump that descended into a row between the two leaders. Zelensky and Sir Keir also signed a £2.26bn loan for Ukrainian military supplies, that will be repaid using profits from frozen Russian assets. The prime minister will host a summit of European and Canadian leaders in London later as part of efforts to bring the Russia-Ukraine war to an end. Zelensky is then due to meet King Charles.

Those meetings will now be overshadowed by events in Washington and concerns about a hardening of relations with the US. In recent weeks, the prime minister has sought to cast himself as a bridge between the US and Europe as it adapts to the Trump administration’s desire to be less involved in European defence, having a cordial meeting with Trump a day before Zelensky’s. During that meeting, he hand-delivered a letter from the King inviting Trump – who is fond of the Royal Family – to an unprecedented second state visit, which SNP MPs called on the PM to withdraw following the Oval Office spat. Sir Keir has also attempted to be a conduit for Ukraine as it seeks US security guarantees in any peace deal – contacting both Trump and Zelensky by phone on Friday evening in the aftermath of their row. The visit to Downing Street on Saturday was an opportunity for the PM to demonstrate his continued support for Zelensky following the public falling-out with Trump. Remarking on cheers he heard outside, Sir Keir told the Ukrainian leader: “That is the people of the United Kingdom coming out to demonstrate how much they support you, how much they support Ukraine.” He added: “We stand with you and Ukraine for as long as it may take.” Zelensky replied: “I saw a lot of people and I want to thank you, the people of the United Kingdom, [for] such big support from the very beginning of this war.” He said he was happy about meeting the King on Sunday, and was thankful for the European summit. It is understood the meeting between Zelensky and the King was requested by the Ukrainian president, with the UK government agreeing to it. Following the Downing Street meeting, Zelensky praised the UK’s “tremendous” support, noting in particular the £2.26bn loan paid for through Russian assets frozen since the war began. He said the funds will be used to produce weapons in Ukraine, declaring: “This is true justice – the one who started the war must be the one to pay.” The loan was first announced in October.

Watch: Starmer meets Zelensky in Downing Street

Following the acrimonious White House visit, Zelensky has attempted to mend US ties. In a statement, he said of Trump: “Despite the tough dialogue, we remain strategic partners. But we need to be honest and direct with each other to truly understand our shared goals.” When his plane landed at Stansted, the Ukrainian leader wrote in a string of social media posts: “It’s crucial for us to have President Trump’s support. He wants to end the war, but no-one wants peace more than we do. “We are the ones living this war in Ukraine. It’s a fight for our freedom, for our very survival.” Sunday’s summit in London is the latest round of top-level European meetings in response to Washington’s new approach to ending the war in Ukraine, which began with Russia’s full-scale invasion just over three years ago. The Trump administration has so far excluded Europe from preliminary talks with Russia, while the US president has been accused of parroting Russian propaganda. Top of the agenda on Sunday will be increasing Europe’s defence capabilities as Washington steps back as well as seeking security guarantees for Ukraine from the White House as part of any peace deal. Ahead of the last leaders’ summit in Paris, Sir Keir proposed deploying British troops to Ukraine as part of a European peacekeeping force – but said this would require a US security “backstop”. Trump has consistently resisted fully committing direct military support to a Ukraine peace deal, but has offered closer economic ties including a minerals deal, which he said could act as a deterrent. Since Friday’s row, media reports from the US suggest Trump is considering cutting off aid to Ukraine altogether. At the same time, European leaders have recognised the need to increase defence spending – but experts have warned the UK’s military is currently not ready to take on an expanded defence role.

Watch: From laughter to anger, how the Oval Office meeting spiralled

Open this photo in gallery: U.S. President Donald Trump withdrew from a joint statement by tweet at 2018’s Charlevoix summit.Doug Mills/The New York Times/The New York Times News Service

The last time Canada hosted a G7 summit, Tristen Naylor gained access as an unusual spectator. He was embedded as an academic observing the summit management office that oversaw the 2018 events at Charlevoix, Que. It was, he recalls, a marvel of organization, governed by a 132-page event “bible.”

“It’s page after page of minute-by-minute play-by-play on how the summit runs, with schematics and diagrams of every room setup, who stands where, how many cars you need,” said Mr. Naylor, the director of the Oxbridge Diplomatic Academy.

But as Canada once again prepares for some of the world’s most powerful leaders to meet at G7 meetings that begin this weekend, all of that meticulous planning – and any hopes for agreement or even basic comity – must reckon with a series of unknowns.

Open this photo in gallery: Military vehicles manoeuvre in Gaza as worldwide conflict rages against the background of the G7 summit.Amir Cohen/Reuters

There are new faces: Britain’s Keir Starmer, Germany’s Friedrich Merz, Japan’s Shigeru Ishiba and the host himself, Prime Minister Mark Carney.

There is a horizon clouded with haze, from the wildfires burning across this country, from the street fires lit in protests across the United States, from the conflagrations still raging in Ukraine and Gaza, from the trade wars that have drawn the U.S. into conflict with the other countries whose leaders will attend – and, perhaps more than anything, from Donald Trump, who has returned to power with a palpable disdain for the elite multilateralism that is the pillar on which the G7 has stood for a half-century.

And there is history.

Carney should ignore any antics from Trump at G7 and focus on business, Chrétien says

Canada to seek agreements in global peace, energy security and new partnerships at G7, Carney says

The Charlevoix summit ended with Mr. Trump calling then-prime minister Justin Trudeau “very dishonest & weak,” and withdrawing by tweet from a joint statement. Seven years later, “at the end of the weekend, if there is no big explosive Trump story, that alone will be a success,” Mr. Naylor said.

“The game is damage limitation.”

The world leaders gathering this weekend in Kananaskis, Alta., are confronted with a scale of problems that the original Group of Six meeting in 1975 had determined to avoid (Canada did not join until the following year). That first summit, held in France, concluded with an agreement to pursue the “maximum possible level of trade liberalization,” while striking a note of optimism. “Our success will strengthen, indeed is essential to, democratic societies everywhere,” the leaders said in their closing communiqué.

Ottawa under pressure to raise plight of Jimmy Lai at G7 summit

Opinion: Massive fires burning across Alberta have helped put climate change back on the G7 agenda

Fifty years later, the World Bank is forecasting the slowest decade of global growth since the 1960s – the result, in part, of rising tariff rates – while new levels of doubt have shrouded democratic governance. One third of the world’s voters now live in countries where election quality has eroded, the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance has found.

The immensity of those issues stands in contrast to the limited hopes for this G7 meeting, which are so dim that Canada is not planning for a joint communiqué at its conclusion, a senior official told reporters Thursday. Instead, the summit hosts are looking for short joint statements focused on concrete actions and agreements in certain areas. The Globe is not identifying the official, who was not authorized to speak publicly.

Forgoing such a communiqué again this year could sidestep sparring over what language everyone, Mr. Trump included, would find acceptable.

It would also reflect reality. This year’s summit will draw together leaders as a group. But the greatest priority for most of those leaders is one man alone. Since he has returned to office, Mr. Trump has shattered expectations about how international trade should flow, how diplomacy should be done and even how secure other countries should feel within their own borders.

Open this photo in gallery: The Charlevoix summit ended with Trump calling then-prime minister Justin Trudeau ‘very dishonest and weak.’Handout ./Reuters

If that means limited progress on matters of acute global concern, all may not be lost. The G7 has always been a place where personality matters, its annual gathering structured with extensive time for discussion outside the strictures of formal government business. Historically, leaders “were supposed to develop a personal level of relationship and trust, so that at a point in which they might need one another, they knew and trusted one another,” said Douglas Rediker, a Washington-based political adviser who is a non-resident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.

That mandate, he said, matters more than ever.

“This becomes a meeting about taking the temperature of Donald Trump as a man, as a leader, as a policy-maker – as someone they can and cannot do business with, and can and cannot trust,” Mr. Rediker said.

By the standard measure of things, this should be Mr. Carney’s party. As host, he has power over the guest list and influence over the broad agenda for conversation. For Mr. Carney, a former central banker who has spent much of his life in elite company, the summit offers a venue to show action at a time when patience for political puffery has grown thin.

“The publics in the western world are just tired of leaders that spout rhetoric and then don’t get anything done,” said Janice Stein, the founding director of the Munk School of Global Affairs.

Mr. Carney, she said, has at the G7 a moment to pursue his ambition to remake Canada and its place in the world. The question is “how much support can he build for his priorities, and how much traction will he get for them at the G7?”

Open this photo in gallery: The Kananaskis summit offers Prime Minister Mark Carney a chance to show his mettle when public patience for political puffery has grown thin.Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press

Elements of that strategy have come into view with those invited.

With Mexico’s Claudia Sheinbaum, Mr. Carney “is rebalancing our relationships with other powers, but he is still renegotiating a security and economic relationship with the United States. Claudia Sheinbaum is a big piece of that,” Ms. Stein said.

India’s Narendra Modi represents an enormous economy that is for Canada a potential counterweight to China and the U.S. India, which like Canada has struggled to navigate Mr. Trump’s tariffs, “also needs to ramp up its trade policies,” Raja Mohan, a distinguished fellow with the Delhi-based Council for Strategic and Defense Research, said this week in remarks to the Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada.

A meeting between Mr. Carney and Mr. Modi, he said, could deliver a fresh start to trade talks that have been stalled since 2023. “So there is a moment, there, of economic reconstitution that is possible,” Mr. Mohan said.

Elsewhere, though, foreign leaders are preparing for Kananaskis with questions about just how Mr. Carney intends to rebalance international relationships.

Opinion: Mark Carney’s go-it-alone approach is born of necessity

Germany embraces militarism for the first time since the Second World War

Take North American trade.

The U.S. government has privately given some positive signals on the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, a senior Mexican government official said. On one recent occasion, a top U.S. Trade Representative official said behind closed doors that the U.S. may choose to only “review” USMCA rather than renegotiate it, the Mexican official said. The Trump administration is considering a timeline of July or September to get started, the source said, and Mexico would like to work more closely with Canada. The Globe is not identifying the official because they are not authorized to speak publicly.

But there has, to date, been little co-ordination between the two countries, particularly at the political level, the official said.

Other countries will arrive in Canada with eyes trained on Washington, not Ottawa.

For Mr. Ishiba, one of the primary attractions of Kananaskis is the chance of a sideline meeting with Mr. Trump, where the Japanese Prime Minister has said he will press his country’s case personally as tariff negotiations between the two countries drag on.

In return for any tariff carve-outs, Japan is likely to promise to buy large amounts of U.S. energy and weapons.

Open this photo in gallery: Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba is hoping to meet Trump personally as tariff negotiations between the two countries drag on.FRANCK ROBICHON / POOL/Reuters

“Japan’s major priority will be twofold – ensuring the focus is on a rules-based international order and making progress on bilateral tariff negotiations when Ishiba and Trump meet,” said Rintaro Nishimura, a Tokyo-based associate with the Asia Group, a strategic advisory firm.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, meanwhile, will arrive in Kananaskis with hopes that other G7 leaders can together persuade Mr. Trump to take tough new measures against Russia.

Response to Russia’s actions in Ukraine, including massive air attacks over the past week, should be met not with “silence from the world, but concrete action,” Mr. Zelensky wrote on social media this week. “Action from America, which has the power to force Russia into peace. Action from Europe, which has no alternative but to be strong. Action from others around the world who called for diplomacy and an end to the war – and whom Russia has ignored.”

Lisa Yasko, a member of the Ukrainian parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee, said her country was looking to the G7 to lead the way with a new round of sanctions to punish Russia for refusing to accept a ceasefire.

The joint communiqué issued by G7 foreign ministers at the end of their March meeting in Charlevoix had threatened exactly that.

But as foreign leaders arrive in Canada seeking time with Mr. Trump, they worry his focus is directed somewhere else.

Ms. Yasko said there was concern that Mr. Trump was too preoccupied with domestic politics – his feud with Elon Musk, and the deployment of troops to California – to focus on helping Ukraine, which has a dwindling supply of U.S. weaponry sent by Mr. Trump’s predecessor, Joe Biden. Mr. Trump has approved only a single arms sale to Ukraine – US$310-million in spare parts and other support for F-16 fighter jets – since taking office in January.

Open this photo in gallery: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and other G7 leaders may try to talk Trump into taking tough new measures against Russia.Evgeniy Maloletka/The Associated Press

“It’s not that easy for the average Ukrainian person to understand why the Americans are not doing certain things,” Ms. Yasko said in a telephone interview. “It all looks as if all the attention is more focused on the internal agenda, rather than what happens in foreign affairs, where the actions of United States are very much needed.”

The G7 concluded last year’s summit in Apulia, Italy, with a 36-page statement that listed 11 main points of agreement, from standing in solidarity with Ukraine to a renewed commitment toward gender equality and taking concrete steps on reducing climate change.

Few expect such language to emerge from Kananaskis.

“This is not going to be Trudeau and Macron smiling and chatting it out. That is a different world,” said Sumantra Maitra, a senior fellow at the Center for Renewing America, a MAGA think tank.

Instead, in the areas where previous summits found common ground, Mr. Trump’s arrival at the gathering may bring reason for dispute. Take Mr. Zelensky, who sparred with the U.S. leader in the White House. Having the Ukrainian President there “is potentially far more destabilizing than anything,” said Mr. Maitra, who has advised Mr. Trump but does not speak for the administration.

Then there is Mr. Trump’s personal distaste for some leaders, such as France’s Emmanuel Macron, and his distrust of multinational institutions.

“He’s not looking for some kind of consensus-building, kumbayah exercise on the international stage. That’s not his style and approach,” said Nile Gardiner, a specialist in foreign policy with the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank.

Across a series of issues at the G7, he said, “one cannot rule out the strong potential for real conflict.”

Liberal MPs react to the decision by Prime Minister Mark Carney to invite Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the G7 Summit in Alberta, despite tensions over allegations India was involved in the killing of a Canadian in British Columbia in 2023. The Canadian Press

Mr. Trump, for example, has sought major spending increases among NATO allies, “and I would expect that he will be raising that issue significantly, especially on Canadian soil, as Canada has been in President Trump’s eyes one of the worst offenders on low defence spending,” Mr. Gardiner said.

Mr. Carney has sought to blunt that blow, saying this week Canadian defence spending will soon reach two per cent of GDP. Mr. Trump is likely to seek more.

Even so, against that set of low expectations, the G7 leaders may discover more areas of agreement than anticipated, said John Kirton, a political scientist at the University of Toronto who is director of the G7 Research Group.

“The secret to success is letting Donald Trump credibly claim that he led and won the G7 on some serious things. And there are standout candidates where it’s relatively easy to do,” he said.

Take a need for stimulus spending through tax cuts or defence spending. Or a commitment to fighting transnational crime and the drug trade. Or a pledge to make mandatory the removal of non-consensual sexual imagery, including pornographic deepfakes, from the internet – something the U.S. recently legislated. Or a common dedication to confronting China on security, trade and transnational repression. Or a pledge to act against crimes committed by undocumented migrants, a subject of nearly as much concern in Berlin as in Washington.

Open this photo in gallery: World leaders gathering this weekend in Kananaskis, Alta., will be confronted with a multitude of issues.Todd Korol/Reuters

Yet Mr. Trump could just as easily be provoked into anger by some perceived slight.

Worse, he could back his hosts into a corner from which there is no polite exit.

“If he says something really outrageous about Canadian sovereignty or the 51st state that can’t be characterized as a joke – the only precedent we have in this country for that kind of behaviour is 1967,” said Chris Alexander, a former cabinet minister under Stephen Harper, recalling Ottawa’s bitter condemnation of Charles de Gaulle’s “Vive le Québec libre” refrain that preceded the French president cutting short his visit.

Still, he said, diminished expectations for what this G7 will accomplish should not diminish its importance. Whatever it yields – be it insults or be it harmony – will offer insight into the direction of international affairs at a moment when Mr. Trump is far from the only leader questioning old assumptions.

“We are in something like a pivot away from globalization,” said Mr. Alexander. “Does the summit amplify those trend lines? Or does it slow them down and moderate them? That is a question that I think is worth watching for.”

With a report from Steven Chase

A landmark sign of the G7 2025 logo is seen on the lawn outside the Banff media center ahead of the Group of Seven (G7) Summit in Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada on June 16, 2025.

Group of Seven powers on Sunday began negotiating on whether they can find common ground on an escalating conflict between Iran and Israel, as leaders including US President Donald Trump arrived for a summit in the Canadian Rockies.

The three-day gathering in the mountain town of Kananaskis marks the return to the international diplomatic calendar for Trump, who has stunned allies by defying norms and slapping sweeping tariffs on friend and foe alike.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney had designed an agenda aimed at minimising disagreements within the club of wealthy industrial democracies – Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United States.

But Israel shocked the world two days before the summit with a surprise, massive military campaign against Iran.

Watch moreWorld’s papers react to unprecedented Israeli strikes on Iran

Canada is now sounding out countries about making a joint call on Israel and Iran, diplomats said.

The statement could call for de-escalation or could simply back Israel, saying that it has a “right to defend itself” due to Iran’s contested nuclear work.

European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen told reporters that she spoke with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu before the summit and agreed that Iran was to blame.

“Of course I think a negotiated solution is, in the long term, the best solution,” she said, stopping short of calling for an immediate ceasefire.

Trump has praised Israel’s strikes, noting it used US weapons, even though Netanyahu defied his public calls to hold off as the United States sought a negotiated solution.

Unusually, Japan, which historically has maintained cordial ties with Iran, made a forceful break with allies in the United States and Europe when it denounced Israel’s strikes as “deeply regrettable”.

European powers have all steered clear of criticising Israel on the Iran strikes, despite separate concern about the humanitarian situation in besieged Gaza.

French President Emmanuel Macron has called for restraint and urged Iran to re-enter talks with the United States, while also blaming Tehran for escalating tensions over its nuclear program.

Read moreMacron urges renewed nuclear dialogue after Israel’s Iran strikes

Visiting ’51st state’

Trump is visiting Canada despite his mockery of the United States’ northern neighbour, which he has said would be better off as the 51st state.

Tensions have eased since Carney, a former central banker known more for his competence than pizzazz, took over in March from Justin Trudeau, an erstwhile star on the global stage whom Trump made no secret of disliking.

When Trump last visited Canada for a G7 summit, in 2018, he bolted out early and tweeted from Air Force One insults about Trudeau, disassociating the United States from the final statement.

But deep tensions remain. Trump, seeking a radical transformation of a global economic order centered on free trade, has vowed to slap sweeping tariffs on US friends and foes alike on July 9, a deadline he postponed once.

Von der Leyen, who spoke to Trump by telephone on Saturday, voiced hope that the Europeans can reach a solution and offered veiled criticism of the US approach.

“Let us keep trade between us fair, predictable and open. All of us need to avoid protectionism,” she said.

To display this content from YouTube, you must enable advertisement tracking and audience measurement. Accept Manage my choices One of your browser extensions seems to be blocking the video player from loading. To watch this content, you may need to disable it on this site. Try again 12:52 Reporters © FRANCE 24

Linking Ukraine and Iran

Von der Leyen also called for the Group of Seven to link the crises in Iran and Ukraine, which has been hit by drones sold to Russia by Tehran’s cleric-run state.

“The same type of Iranian-designed and -made drones and ballistic missiles are indiscriminately hitting cities in Ukraine and in Israel. As such, these threats need to be addressed together,” she said.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is among the invited guests and hopes to speak to Trump, who publicly derided him when they met at the White House on February 28.

Trump had hoped to force Ukraine into a quick deal with Russia, but he has grown frustrated after President Vladimir Putin refused US-led appeals for at least a temporary truce.

Trump spoke by telephone with Putin on Saturday, both about the Israel-Iran conflict and Ukraine.

Macron, however, cast doubt on Putin serving as a Middle East mediator.

The French president headed to Kananaskis after stopping in Greenland, where he denounced Trump’s threats to seize the Danish autonomous territory.

“That’s not what allies do,” he said.

Trump for his part arrived at the summit after attending a military parade in Washington that coincided with his birthday, prompting nationwide protests over steps seen as increasingly authoritarian.

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)