Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth gestures during a news conference at the NATO summit in The Hague on Wednesday.

Israel’s preliminary analysis of the damage caused by U.S. strikes on Iran’s main nuclear facilities — based in part from on-the-ground assessments — shows the attacks inflicted widespread destruction, a senior Israeli official said.

The official, granted anonymity to speak candidly, said that Tehran has been “actively trying to hide the damage” from the Sunday attacks, which President Trump said in The Hague on Wednesday had all but eliminated Iran’s enrichment program.

Trump, who repeatedly defended the effectiveness of the strikes at the NATO summit, made reference to individuals who had been on the ground to assess the damage, without providing details.

Advertisement

“I can’t say it’s a final assessment, because we’re less than a week after,” the Israeli official said. “It’s not like we can send officers openly. But that’s the indication we have now.”

A spokesperson for Iran’s foreign ministry on Wednesday said the bombing raid “badly damaged” the nuclear sites, but the Iranian government has said it will continue its nuclear efforts, which it insists are for peaceful purposes.

A full review of the mission could take weeks, and experts have expressed skepticism of declarative statements by Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that the U.S. operation was a success within mere days of the attack.

Advertisement

“Battlefield damage assessment is an imprecise art, with initial estimates frequently being way off,” said Patrick Clawson, an expert on Iran and director for research at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. “I would be very suspicious of any claims — by Iran, by Trump, by Israel — about what has happened to Iran’s enriched uranium stocks or to its centrifuges.”

Israel’s preliminary findings come after an initial assessment from the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency cast doubt on the effectiveness of the American strikes, stating with low confidence that Iran had retained the core elements of its nuclear program despite the attacks, one U.S. official familiar with the findings told The Times. The DIA assessment was first reported by CNN.

The U.S. attack followed nine days of an Israeli military campaign that decimated Iran’s air defenses, its military leadership and its ballistic missile stockpiles, while degrading its nuclear facilities.

Advertisement

Israeli intelligence has also monitored the reaction to the campaign among Iranian leadership, which has struggled to comprehend the extent of the damage itself, the Israeli official said.

“We don’t believe everyone in the leadership knows what really happened, because the whole program was compartmentalized — they weren’t sharing a lot of information, and a lot of the officers who were highly involved on the ground level were eliminated,” the official continued. “So a lot of the top leadership hasn’t fully begun to understand what’s happened.”

The developing intelligence picture comes as Trump defended the U.S. mission, called Operation Midnight Hammer, during multiple appearances at the NATO summit in The Hague on Wednesday.

“It’s been obliterated, totally obliterated,” he said of Iran’s nuclear facilities. Addressing the DIA report, he added: “They did a report, but it was like, if you look at the dates, it’s just a few days after.”

The U.S. deployment of massive, “bunker buster” munitions targeting Iran’s main nuclear sites — including six dropped on Fordo, a facility burrowed deep into the side of a mountain — was intended to bury its most advanced equipment and most highly enriched uranium, which can be used to build nuclear warheads.

Initial assessments of the damage were unclear, but since then, Trump said, “we’ve collected additional intelligence. We’ve also spoken to people that have seen the site, and the site is obliterated.”

Ceasefires are often frustrating, touch-and-go affairs, so when President Trump delivered an expletive-filled dressing-down to Israel and Iran on Tuesday, accusing both sides of violating the truce, many wondered if the agreement would succeed.

Initial signs seemed discouraging. The ceasefire ended the bloodiest bout of violence in the decades-long grudge match between Iran and Israel, but the hours after its immediate announcement saw some of the fiercest fighting in the 12-day war. Israel then accused Iran of firing missiles after the deadline and scrambled planes to pound Tehran before an infuriated Trump called Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who ordered them to turn back.

Since that shaky start, the truce remained in place on Wednesday, even as both sides warily eyed each other and threatened to restart military action if needed.

But with questions mounting over the impact of the combined U.S. and Israeli onslaught on Iran’s nuclear facilities and military infrastructure — the very reason why Israel launched its campaign in the first place — a return to hostilities could be a matter of when, not if. Another pressing question: Was Iran’s nuclear program severely damaged — as Trump maintains — or just hobbled?

Advertisement

A U.S. Air Force B-2 Spirit is prepared for operations this month at Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri. (U.S. Air Force)

On Tuesday, a classified report by the Pentagon’s intelligence branch, the Defense Intelligence Agency, assessed that U.S. strikes, which dropped 14 30,000-pound “bunker buster” bombs and fired Tomahawk missiles over the weekend on Iranian nuclear installations in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan, failed to destroy core components of Iran’s nuclear program and that any setback would be a matter of a few months.

The assessment, first reported by CNN, spurred infuriated retorts from Trump administration officials and Trump himself, who during a NATO summit in Europe on Wednesday lashed out at media reporting on the assessment, calling them “scum” and saying Iran’s nuclear ambitions have been set back decades.

“That hit ended the war… Can you imagine after all that they say, ‘Oh, let’s go and do a bomb,’” Trump said in a news conference. “They’re not going to have a bomb and they’re not going to enrich.”

Iran, which portrays the ceasefire as a victory, has taken the opposite tack, with officials saying the program will continue.

Mohammad Eslami, head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, said on Tuesday that damage assessments to the targeted sites were ongoing, but the government “planned ahead of time” to prevent any interruption” to its nuclear program.

Advertisement

Iran had long maintained it is developing its nuclear capabilities for peaceful purposes. Israel and Trump say it plans to build nuclear weapons.

A man sweeps where a car is covered by rubble in a residential area of Tehran’s Marzdaran district, where Iranian nuclear scientists were hit in recent drone strikes. (Majid Saeedi / Getty Images)

Another Iranian official said that despite Israel’s assassination of many nuclear scientists, the country’s nuclear know-how remains intact. Satellite imagery from the days ahead of the attack showed truck activity near Fordo, Iran’s main uranium enrichment site, suggesting that Iran’s uranium stockpile and its centrifuge capabilities were moved ahead of the strikes and remain unaccounted for, experts say.

During his news conference in The Hague, Trump dismissed the notion that Iran had enough time to move its stockpiles.

“It’s very hard to remove that kind of material, very hard and very dangerous for them to remove it,” Trump said. “Plus they knew we were coming, and if they know we’re coming, they’re not going to be down there.”

Trump said the U.S. attacks all but eliminated Iran’s enrichment program. A high-ranking Israeli official, granted anonymity to speak candidly, told The Times that Israel’s preliminary assessment shows that Iran’s nuclear infrastructure suffered widespread destruction.

Advertisement

Regardless of the strikes’ effectiveness, Iran appears set to further push its nuclear program underground.

On Wednesday, the country’s parliament voted to suspend cooperation with the United Nations’ International Atomic Energy Agency, according to the state media outlet. The vote is largely symbolic, since a decision of this nature would be in the hands of the Supreme National Security Council, the governing body overseen by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Last week, IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said Iran has enough material for “several warheads” but that was not the same as having a nuclear weapon.

“We do not have at this point — if you ask me, at this time — any tangible proof that there is a program, or a plan, to fabricate, to manufacture a nuclear weapon,” he said.

Hezbollah supporters wave Iranian and Hezbollah flags and chant slogans during a gathering outside the Iranian Embassy in Beirut, Lebanon, Wednesday, to honor the Islamic Republic of Iran for what organizers described as “breaking American and Israeli aggression.” (Hassan Ammar / Associated Press) People fold tents at an underground shelter they stayed in during the war with Iran after the ceasefire was announced in Tel Aviv, Israel, Tuesday. (Ohad Zwigenberg / Associated Press)

On June 12, the IAEA’s Board of Governors declared Iran had breached its nonproliferation obligations for the first time in almost 20 years. Israel began its campaign a day later.

Advertisement

Some Iranian officials have suggested it could withdraw from the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), the landmark 1970 agreement that legitimized nuclear arms for the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council but proscribed their development for other nations. Signatories can access non-military atomic technology so long as they do not pursue weaponization and submit to IAEA monitoring to ensure no diversion of nuclear fuel.

“We have worked for many years to demonstrate to the world that we are committed to the NPT and are willing to work within its framework, but unfortunately, this treaty has not been able to protect us or our nuclear program,” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in an interview with Qatari news outlet Al Araby Al Jadeed this week.

“I think that our view on our nuclear program and the nonproliferation regime will witness changes, but it is not possible to say in what direction.”

If Iran were to withdraw, it would be following North Korea’s playbook. Pyongyang pulled out of the NPT in 2003, justifying its move because of fears the U.S. was planning a preemptive attack; it conducted its first nuclear weapons test three years later. India, Pakistan and Israel never signed the agreement. Israel is the only country in the Middle East with nuclear warheads.

In the meantime, the extent of Israel’s intelligence penetration of Iran — aptly demonstrated on June 13 when Israeli forces disabled Iranian air defenses while tracking and killing top military commanders and veteran nuclear scientists — has pushed the Iranian government’s paranoia to extreme levels.

Iranian state-affiliated media said intelligence and security forces in the country arrested more than 700 suspects in an Israeli “spy network” during the 12-day war. On Wednesday, the government executed three people over allegations they spied for Israel, adding to a spate of hangings for espionage that have taken place in recent days.

Advertisement

This spring, Iranian and U.S. officials met to discuss Iran’s nuclear program and during Trump’s visit to the Middle East in May, he said the United States and Iran “may be” getting close to a deal on what Iran could, or could not do, with nuclear technology. Administration officials say the U.S. and Iran are already in preliminary discussions about resuming negotiations.

But commentators say a major factor determining Tehran’s return to the table is whether Trump can ensure no more Israeli attacks, or his willingness to countenance Israeli military action, as he does in Lebanon, whose government accuses Israel of near-daily violations of a November ceasefire that ended the war with the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah. Israel says it is acting to prevent Hezbollah from reconstituting itself.

President Trump stands between Secretary of State Marco Rubio, right, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth during a news conference Wednesday at the NATO summit in The Hague. (Markus Schreiber / Associated Press)

“Does Trump have the ability to restrict Netanyahu’s freedom of action inside Iran?” said Ellie Geranmayeh, a senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations.

“If he’s able to really set fire under Netanyahu’s feet and say, ‘No more,’ then the Iranians will open up to direct engagement with the Americans.”

But Trump suggested Wednesday that while talks might resume, they may not be necessary.

“I’ll tell you what, we’re going to talk with them next week, with Iran. We may sign an agreement, I don’t know,” Trump said. But he added that there wasn’t need for an agreement because the U.S. destroyed Iran’s nuclear program. “The way I look at it, they fought, the war is done,” he said.

Advertisement

Times staff writer Michael Wilner in The Hague contributed to this report.

On June 25, Israeli military spokesperson Avichay Adraee declared that “Operation Rising Lion” had set back Iran’s nuclear program by years. IDF officials echoed this, including Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir. However, a U.S. intelligence assessment contradicted this claim, saying the delay might only be months. Iran’s nuclear timeline remains uncertain as satellite images and classified reports offer mixed views. Although Israel insists its airstrikes were precise, Iran rejects those claims. These geopolitical tensions impacted oil prices and stock markets around the globe.

Conflicting Claims Over Operation Rising Lion’s Impact And Nuclear Delay

Israel launched “Operation Rising Lion” with one goal, cripple Iran’s nuclear capability. According to IDF Spokesman Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin, all objectives were met, “even better than we thought.” He added that it was too early to determine the full impact. However, he reiterated that they “set it back by years.” Lt. Gen. Zamir also stated the same about Iran’s missile program. But the United States intelligence painted a different picture.

The Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) reported the setback could last only one to two months. Their analysis cited satellite data and said Iran might restart uranium enrichment within months. One U.S. official even suggested the extent of damage remained unclear. Deep underground facilities like Fordow showed external damage, but no structural collapse. Iran may rebuild power and water lines faster than expected.

The Dispute Within U.S. Intelligence and Politics

Disagreement runs deep within the U.S. administration. President Trump claimed the strikes “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear sites. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth backed this, calling the bombings a complete success. But multiple anonymous officials disagreed. They highlighted that Iran’s highly enriched uranium stocks remain intact. Centrifuges were also reportedly unaffected at some locations. Analysts pointed out that imagery can’t reveal damage deep below the surface.

David Albright, a former U.N. inspector, observed visible damage through commercial satellite images. He warned, however, that Iran’s breakout capability still exists. Some Democrats in Congress, including Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, said they had seen no evidence of total obliteration. Scheduled briefings were also canceled, adding more uncertainty. This internal divide only raises more questions about what the operation truly achieved.

Oil Supply, India, and Market Reactions

The conflict’s effects extend far beyond military zones. According to SBI Research, the Strait of Hormuz has become a strategic flashpoint. Around 20% of global oil flows through this chokepoint. India, which imports 90% of its oil, is especially exposed. Though it does not buy directly from Iran, 40% of India’s crude passes through the Strait. Disruptions could create major logistical issues.

According to a June 25 note from SBI Research, oil prices could rise to $85 per barrel. This is well above the long-term average of $78. Freight rates have also surged. The Chinese crude oil Tanker Freight Index has climbed, signaling stress. Maritime insurance premiums have jumped. Global shipping faces a wave of volatility. India and other importing nations remain cautious, watching the geopolitical shifts unfold.

Nuclear Delay: Thailand, Inflation, and the Global Economic Ripple

Outside the Middle East, the conflict is already unsettling regional economies. The Bank of Thailand is trying to keep the interest rates steady amid these political shifts. Thailand’s growth slowed to 3.1%, and local markets remain under pressure. A wider economic impact looms if oil prices keep rising. Energy-dependent nations, especially in Asia, may suffer inflationary pressure. For now, governments are taking a wait-and-see approach. The true economic cost will depend on the conflict’s duration and Iran’s next steps.

Operation Rising Lion has generated bold claims and intense debate. Israel insists it dealt a severe blow to Iran’s nuclear progress. The United States, despite official confidence, shows signs of internal disagreement. Experts outside the government suggest Iran’s capabilities were hurt but not destroyed. Meanwhile, oil markets around the globe feel the early consequences. Thailand’s economic stance hints at broader anxiety. As assessments evolve and realities surface, the world watches to see whether this nuclear delay becomes fact or fades into political messaging.

Avichay Adraee tweeted that the Israeli Defense Forces revealed Iran’s fund transfer system supporting Hezbollah. Jets struck southern Lebanon, killing Haitham Abdullah Bakri, head of the “Al-Sadiq” exchange. Bakri knowingly worked with Hezbollah to fund terror activities. His network stored and moved Iranian Quds Force money. These funds bought weapons, materials, and paid operatives. Iran used “Al-Sadiq” to finance Hezbollah’s military actions. Over the weekend, forces killed Behnam Shahriari in Iran. He led Quds Force’s Unit 190, managing transfers of hundreds of millions yearly. His network moved funds through Turkey, Iraq, the UAE, and Lebanese exchangers. Both eliminations dealt a major blow to Iran’s funding routes.