AI is just as overconfident and biased as humans can be, study shows
How did your country report this? Share your view in the comments.
Introduction:
The news topic “AI is just as overconfident and biased as humans can be, study shows” has drawn international attention, with various media outlets providing diverse insights, historical context, political stances, and on-the-ground developments. Below is a curated overview of how different countries and media organizations have covered this topic recently.
Quick Summary:
- A new study has found that artificial intelligence (AI) systems sometimes make decisions as irrationally as we do. In almost half of the scenarios examined in the study, ChatGPT exhibited many of the most common human decision-making biases. The findings are the first to evaluate ChatG PT’s behavior across 18 well-known cognitive biases found in human psychology. The study was published in the journal Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. It was carried out by academics from five academic institutions across Canada and Australia. The authors say managers will benefit most by using these tools for problems that have a clear, formulaic solution. But if you’re using them for subjective or preference-driven decisions, tread carefully, they say. The research was published April 8 in the Journal of Manufacturing & Services Operations Management (JMSOM)
- ChatGPT, a popular AI developed by OpenAI, shows human-like biases in subjective scenarios. In nearly half the tests, ChatGPT made mistakes similar to those made by humans. It showed signs of overconfidence, ambiguity aversion, and even the gambler’s fallacy. The science behind bias isn’t just about flaws – it’s about survival, speed, and pattern recognition, say the researchers. The results of the study were published in the journal of cognitive science. Back to Mail Online home.Back to the page you came from.. The study was published by the Journal of Cognitive Science, a division of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and the University of California, San Francisco (UC San Francisco). The study’s author, Dr. David Bower, says the results show that AI can fall into the same traps as humans.
- ChatGPT, a popular AI model, makes some of the same decision-making mistakes as humans. The AI showed biases like overconfidence and the gambler’s fallacy in nearly half of the tests it was given. Newer versions of AI, like GPT-4, are more accurate in some ways but can still have strong biases in certain situations. The researchers say that businesses and policymakers need to keep a close eye on the decisions made by AI. They recommend regular audits and improvements to AI systems to reduce biases. “AI should be treated like an employee who makes important decisions; it needs oversight and ethical guidelines,” said Meena Andiappan, the lead author of the study and a professor at Western University.“Otherwise, we risk automating flawed thinking instead of improving it.”
Country-by-Country Breakdown:
Original Coverage
A new study has found that artificial intelligence (AI) systems sometimes make decisions as irrationally as we do. In almost half of the scenarios examined in the study, ChatGPT exhibited many of the most common human decision-making biases. The findings are the first to evaluate ChatG PT’s behavior across 18 well-known cognitive biases found in human psychology. The study was published in the journal Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. It was carried out by academics from five academic institutions across Canada and Australia. The authors say managers will benefit most by using these tools for problems that have a clear, formulaic solution. But if you’re using them for subjective or preference-driven decisions, tread carefully, they say. The research was published April 8 in the Journal of Manufacturing & Services Operations Management (JMSOM) Read full article
Can AI systems be trusted to make unbiased decisions? Scientists found out
ChatGPT, a popular AI developed by OpenAI, shows human-like biases in subjective scenarios. In nearly half the tests, ChatGPT made mistakes similar to those made by humans. It showed signs of overconfidence, ambiguity aversion, and even the gambler’s fallacy. The science behind bias isn’t just about flaws – it’s about survival, speed, and pattern recognition, say the researchers. The results of the study were published in the journal of cognitive science. Back to Mail Online home.Back to the page you came from.. The study was published by the Journal of Cognitive Science, a division of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and the University of California, San Francisco (UC San Francisco). The study’s author, Dr. David Bower, says the results show that AI can fall into the same traps as humans. Read full article
ChatGPT study reveals shared human biases
ChatGPT, a popular AI model, makes some of the same decision-making mistakes as humans. The AI showed biases like overconfidence and the gambler’s fallacy in nearly half of the tests it was given. Newer versions of AI, like GPT-4, are more accurate in some ways but can still have strong biases in certain situations. The researchers say that businesses and policymakers need to keep a close eye on the decisions made by AI. They recommend regular audits and improvements to AI systems to reduce biases. “AI should be treated like an employee who makes important decisions; it needs oversight and ethical guidelines,” said Meena Andiappan, the lead author of the study and a professor at Western University.“Otherwise, we risk automating flawed thinking instead of improving it.” Read full article
Global Perspectives Summary:
Global media portray this story through varied cultural, economic, and political filters. While some focus on geopolitical ramifications, others highlight local impacts and human stories. Some nations frame the story around diplomatic tensions and international relations, while others examine domestic implications, public sentiment, or humanitarian concerns. This diversity of coverage reflects how national perspectives, media freedom, and journalistic priorities influence what the public learns about global events.
How did your country report this? Share your view in the comments.
Sources:
- Original Article
- Can AI systems be trusted to make unbiased decisions? Scientists found out
- ChatGPT study reveals shared human biases
Source: https://www.livescience.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/ai-is-just-as-overconfident-and-biased-as-humans-can-be-study-shows