Lawmakers in the New York state Legislature raced to pass more than 800 bills this year.

The pace accelerated in the final days of session this week, as they worked to make up for time lost during prolonged budget negotiations that concluded nearly two months past the April 1 deadline.

The legislation now heads to Gov. Kathy Hochul’s desk for her sign-off.

Here are some of the bills that passed – and didn’t pass – the Assembly and Senate.

First, the ones that passed:

Medical aid in dying

After years of fraught debate, New York could become the 12th state to allow medical assistance in dying for those with terminal illnesses .

The law sets medical and safety standards for determining which patients would qualify for a lethal prescription, and how it should be administered.

The bill was one of the most highly-contested pieces of legislation debated during this session. Supporters said the provision would let loved ones die with dignity and on their own terms. Opponents, including the state’s Roman Catholic bishops, said the bill was morally repugnant and ripe for abuse.

Prison reform

New York’s corrections systems came under scrutiny this year, and that only intensified as the legislative session wore on. It began before lawmakers returned to Albany this year when an incarcerated person, a Black man named Robert Brooks, was beaten to death in December by corrections officers in an upstate prison – and all of it was caught on body-worn cameras.

Then came the death of Messiah Nantwi, another Black man who was also handcuffed, and similarly beaten by corrections officers. His death occurred as wildcat strikes from corrections cropped up across the state.

The deaths and strikes prompted state legislators to pass a package of bills that they say will increase transparency and accountability.

Tighter regulations on artificial intelligence – for now

As federal lawmakers look to block states from enforcing their own regulations on artificial intelligence, New York went ahead with imposing more safety requirements on state-of-the-art AI models .

One bill , called the Responsible AI Safety and Education, or RAISE, Act, requires developers to inform the state when there are major security incidents – which the authors envisioned could include when a model acts on its own without a user to prompt it.

Tech companies and trade organizations are urging Hochul to veto the bill, while technology ethics organizations are adamant she sign it.

Mandated time off for state troopers after traumatic incidents

If signed by Hochul, state troopers would be required to take time off after experiencing a traumatic incident while on the job.

State troopers would receive at least 20 days of paid leave if their actions resulted in someone’s death or serious injury. Troopers involved in similar incidents but didn’t directly cause harm would get 15 days of paid leave.

Sen. Jeremy Cooney, D-Rochester, sponsored the bill with state troopers’ support. They argued that the law would give troopers space to process trauma without having to take unpaid leave or vacation time to do so.

“Our law enforcement officials who are on the front lines are witnessing very traumatic events, whether it’s the death or serious injury of a civilian or of a fellow officer,” Cooney told the New York Public News Network. “When you come back to the force, you are ready to better serve our community. We believe every law enforcement organization should be able to have this, but we want to start with our state police in New York and become a model for the rest of the nation.”

Warning labels for social media

Social media apps might soon come with a warning label.

State lawmakers took steps to require social media companies to add a label that warns users that there are negative mental health effects when those apps are used excessively. The warning label would appear when users open the app or access the platform

“Beyond the oft-cited side effects of depression, anxiety, and body dysmorphia, leaked company documents reveal that social media companies knew that compulsive use of their products was also associated with ‘loss of analytical skills, memory formation, contextual thinking, conversational depth, (and) empathy,’” according to the bill language.

Increased protections for sex workers

Lawmakers agreed to grant immunity to sex workers and survivors of human trafficking who report a crime to law enforcement or help them in a criminal investigation.

Proponents of the bill say that sex workers are often victims of sexual violence, and increasing legal protections for workers would make them more likely to report cases without fear of retaliation or other repercussions.

Consumer protection practices (sort of)

Several bills aimed at bolstering consumer protection practices either got watered down or laid aside after concerted lobbying from business groups slowed momentum for the proposals.

One bill would have capped fees and let performers pull tickets for their shows off of resale sites, like StubHub, if they were selling them for a profit. While the omnibus bill didn’t get a vote, lawmakers did agree to extend existing laws that set guardrails on certain reselling practices.

Another bill, backed by New York Attorney General Letitia James, allows the attorney general’s office to make it easier to bring lawsuits against businesses who violate consumer protection standards.

Currently, state law allows consumers to sue over “deceptive” practices. While lawmakers tried to broaden the standard to “unfair” and “abusive” practices, lobbying from business trades compelled lawmakers to only broaden that standard for the attorney general’s office when issuing lawsuits.

Now, the bills that didn’t get passed:

Reuniting people with their deceased pets

Lawmakers proposed a bill that would require municipal employees to try to identify and notify owners of a deceased dog or cat found on public roads.

State Sen. Michelle Hinchey, a Hudson Valley Democrat, sponsored the bill and argued the public service would help families find closure after what is often anguished searches for their pets.

The bill passed unanimously in the Senate but did not get a floor vote in the Assembly.

Environmental legislation

Some environmental advocates thought this would be the year when New York would curb the amount of plastic packaging used for products, and take substantive steps to heat homes with renewable energy sources.

But the two bills in question – the Package Reduction and Recycling Infrastructure Act, and the New York HEAT Act – both stalled in the Assembly.

A measure that would have paused the use of sewage sludge as fertilizer also failed to pass.

Voluntary Intoxication Loophole

State law currently makes it a crime to have sex with someone who was drugged by someone else. But sexual assault survivors say there’s a “voluntary intoxication” loophole, because the state has no way to deal with situations where somebody voluntarily consumes drugs or alcohol, and another person takes advantage of their inebriation.

Prosecutors and sexual assault support groups backed a bill that would close that loophole. The Senate passed the bill, but the Assembly did not take it up for debate.

Bans on certain food additives

Another piece of legislation that did not get passed would have taken a blue-state regulatory approach to an issue that has captivated “Make America Health Again” supporters: foot additives.

Lawmakers had proposed a bill that would have banned certain food dyes and required companies that sell packaged foods to disclose more information about the additives they put into their products.

The legislation listed three additives to be banned from products that have outlawed in Europe over concerns they are carcinogenic or can harm the endocrine system: Red #3, potassium bromate and propylparaben.

About

The Plastics and the Environment series is a set of online resources on the plastics crisis, its impact on people and the environment, and international cooperation to address this global problem. Compiled by the Geneva Environment Network, the series includes resources and news from organizations in Geneva and beyond, including UN-system organizations and other IOs, governmental authorities, civil society organizations, academic institutions and journals, and renowned newspapers. The page offers an overview of the different issues surrounding plastic pollution. Detailed information and resources are available for each section by clicking on the “In Focus” buttons.

World Environment Day 2025 The 2025 edition of World Environment Day will focus on putting an end to global plastic pollution. For decades, plastic pollution has seeped into every corner of the world, leaching into the water we drink, into the food we eat, and our bodies. While plastic pollution is a major concern, it is also one of the most fixable of today’s environmental challenges, with some obvious solutions at hand.

Ambition to Beat Plastic Pollution Plastics are fueling the climate crisis. By 2040, up to 19% of global greenhouse gas emissions will stem from plastics. To meet the goal of 1.5° global temperature rise & to #BeatPlasticPollution, we need a plastics treaty that reduces plastic production.

UN Secretary-General António Guterres, 15 November 2023 Every minute the equivalent of 1 garbage truck of plastic is dumped into the ocean. To Beat Plastic Pollution and mitigate its impacts, we must reduce the production of plastic. Change starts with each of us.

UN Secretary-General António Guterres, 10 April 2023

Towards an International Legally Binding Instrument

Taking Stock of the Global Plastic Crisis

In this section: Plastic Pollution Around the World | Plastic Production and Industry | Plastic and COVID-19

Plastic Pollution Around the World

The world is facing a global plastics crisis. Out of the 8.3 billion tons of plastics produced since the 1950s, 79% ended in landfills or leaked into the environment. From the Mariana trench to Mt. Everest, there is virtually no place on Earth which is left untouched by plastic pollution. Plastic waste is now so ubiquitous in the natural environment that scientists have even suggested it could serve as a geological indicator of the Anthropocene era.

Plastics Production and the Plastic Industry

Plastic pollution is a rather new but exponentially growing phenomenon. Annual global plastic production has exploded over the past decades, going from some 1.5 million metric tons (MT) in 1950 to an astonishing 413.8 million metric tons in 2023 (Statista, 2024). Plastic production is expected to further increase in the coming decades as current investments in petrochemical infrastructure support this trend. Under business-as-usual scenarios, global production of primary plastic could reach up to 1,100 million tonnes by 2050. According to the OECD (2024), annual plastics production and use is projected to rise from 435 million tonnes (Mt) in 2020 to 736 Mt in 2040 in the baseline scenario.

The ongoing boom of plastic production is tightly linked to its reliance on fossil fuels, and major investments in petrochemical infrastructures in key regions of the world. While 99% of plastic materials are produced from fossil feedstock, these industries are closely connected.

Considering the scope and impacts of plastic pollution, an increasing number of actors from governments, civil society and academia are calling for efforts to tackle the crisis at its source by reducing plastic production. In the current energy context, experts are also pointing out to a reduction in the production of non-essential plastics as a way to reduce reliance on gas, while contributing to climate and pollution migitation.

Plastics and COVID-19

The fight against plastic pollution is being hit by the COVID-19 pandemic, as the use of disposable masks, gloves and other protective equipment soars. However, plastic does not inherently make something clean and safe. Find more information on how the pandemic affected the plastic crisis and what can be done to address health concerns while reducing plastic pollution in our special COVID-19 update.

Lifecycle Impacts of Plastics

Plastics are embedded in global and complex value chains. Each stage of the life cycle bears consequences for people and the environment. Although most public attention has been drawn to plastic waste and action to prevent leakage of microplastics and chemicals into the environment from inadequate disposal, addressing the end-of-life of plastic products will not be enough to solve this global crisis. We need to tackle the cross-cutting impacts of plastics and chemical additives throughout extraction, manufacturing, use, and disposal. Plastic pollution means more than just the plastic particles; its also all the chemical that are added to plastics, many of which are known to be harmful to people and the environment. When assessing the impacts of plastics, it’s important to consider plastic debris, micro- and nano-plastics, as well as chemical additives.

Plastic pollution is one of the global issue which clearly illustrate that the triple planetary crisis that we are facing – pollution, biodiversity loss, and climate change – are all different sides of the same coin. The impacts of plastics along the lifecycle are cross-sectoral, affecting people and the environment in many ways. As such, it also exemplifies the interconnectedness of the SDGs, as addressing the plastic crisis could reap environmental, social and economic benefits.

Impact on Planet: Biodiversity and Climate Change

Ecosystems and Biodiversity

Given the persistent nature of plastic and its toxicity, plastic pollution is a significant threat to biodiversity. It threatens ecosystems, animal and plant species, impeding their ability to deliver essential services to humanity. While the leakage of plastics into the ocean and the subsequent impacts of marine life has been most studied, plastic pollution also affect freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems.Indeed, plastic and chemical leakage into the environment may arise at various stage of the plastics life cycle, and the resulting pollutants are transported around the globe through air and oceans streams.

Environmental degradation occurs in the upstream, as extraction, fracking, production of plastics and chemical additives release substantial amounts of toxic substances into the air and contaminate the local environment. Disposal is also problematic: incineration of plastic waste releases toxic chemicals and micro- and nano-plastics into the air, while landfills contaminate soil and water. All these elements then impact biodiversity both locally and globally.

Climate Change

As 99% of plastics are created from fossil fuel feedstocks, plastic production is tightly linked to the fossil industry. Petrochemicals are expected to become the largest driver of global oil demand growth from now through 2030. Greenhouse gases (GHG) are emitted throughout the plastic life cycle, thus threatening the ability of the global community to keep global temperature rise below 1.5°C. The rapid global growth of the plastic industry, largely fueled by natural gas, undermines efforts to reduce carbon pollution and prevent a climate catastrophe. Estimates indicate that GHG emissions from plastics could reach about 13% of the entire remaining carbon budget by 2050 (CIEL, 2019). At the UN climate negotiations in Egypt in November 2022 (UNFCCC COP27), various actors are advocating for stronger recognition of the interlinkages between plastics and climate change and urgent action to reduce plastic production and address the impacts of plastic on climate.

Impact on People: Health and Human Rights

Human Health

Humans are exposed to a large variety of toxic chemicals and microplastics through inhalation, ingestion, and direct skin contact, all along the plastic lifecycle. According to WWF, an average person could be ingesting approximately 5 grams of plastic every week. While the health impacts of plastics is still a rather new research area, scientific results to-date do indicate that the toxic chemical additives and pollutants found in plastics threaten human health on a global scale. Scientifically-proven health effects include causing cancer or changing hormone activity (known as endocrine disruption), which can lead to reproductive, growth, and cognitive impairment. Many of the toxic chemical additives have several other known health impacts, persist in the environment, and bioaccumulate in exposed organisms. Research also revealed that microplastics can harm our health, and act as vessels for pathogens to enter our system, increasing the spread of diseases.

Human Rights and Gender

Plastics also have serious impacts on people and their rights. Recent studies and reports have identified quite a large number of human rights impacts and outright violations throughout the life cycle of plastics. These impacts include toxic pollution released in manufacturing, exposure to toxic additives in plastic consumer products, waste mismanagement, disinformation campaign about the risks of and solutions to plastic pollution, and more. Meanwhile, the social and environmental cost of plastics is unevenly distributed around the globe and among social groups. Vulnerable groups, such as children, poorer communities, workers in the informal sector, and small island developing States, are disproportionately impacted. Human rights principles are thus critical to support legitimate and effective responses.

International Cooperation on Plastics

As plastic is a global issue, international cooperation is needed to coordinate actions to have an efficient decision making in order to tackle this major environmental problem. A number of initiatives and activities exist aiming at addressing the plastic waste problem and eliminating plastic litter entering the oceans. A historical turn was reached at the fifth UN Environment Assembly (UNEA-5.2) in February 2022 as countries agreed to establishing an International Negotiating Committee (INC), to develop an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution by the end of 2024. The resolution specifies that the instrument could include both binding and voluntary approaches, based on a comprehensive approach that addresses the full lifecycle of plastic.

Plastic pollution is also addressed in other international fora, including under the Basel Convention, at the World Trade Organizations, at the UN Ocean Conference, through human rights mechanisms, and many others. Our “In Focus” page on this topic provides relevant resources to better understand international cooperation initiatives and processes on plastic pollution, with a focus those which are highly relevant for Geneva. It also provides insights on financing mechanisms for global action on plastic pollution.

The Role of Geneva

As a global hub for environmental governance, Geneva plays an important role in the global response to plastic pollution. With leading organizations on environmental issues, chemical governance, health, human rights and many relevant areas of work, Geneva hosts a strong expertise to contribute to global processes to end plastic pollution. Geneva also hosted the first ever Ministerial Conference on Marine Litter and Plastic Pollution in September 2021. Discover the international and local organizations that are active on the topic in our special “In Focus” page below.

Plastic Waste Management and Recycling

More than 8.3 billion tonnes of plastic has been produced since the early 1950s (UNEP, 2018). This large amount of plastic production and the increase of single-use plastics has led to plastic to become a waste management issue. While reducing the generation of plastic waste in the first place is essential, environmentally sound management of existing plastic waste is crucial to protect the environment and people’s health. Recycling is often discussed as a solution to improve the situation; however, only 14% of plastic waste is currently being collected for recycling. Critics also point out the limitations of recycling methods, the importance of addressing toxic chemicals in recycling processes and the importance of not relying solely on recycling to solve the plastic crisis.

In terms of global governance, the Basel Convention is the key international instrument to regulate transboundary movements of hazardous wastes and their disposal; the Secretariat is based in Geneva. In 2019, Parties to the Convention adopted the Plastic Waste Amendments, and launched the Plastic Waste Partnership to support better management of plastic waste.

Plastics and Trade

International trade flows are central to the production, consumption and disposal of plastic products. Trade in plastics accounts for $1 trillion USD each year, corresponding to about 5% of the total value of merchandise trade. In 2021, plastics trade reached records-high at 1.2 trillion USD. Consequently, trade policy can play an important role in tackling the plastic pollution crisis. The challenges associated with plastic trade go are immense, with plastics being traded globally as fossil feedstock, primary material, manufactured products, and waste. In terms of governance, plastic waste trade is regulated under the Basel Convention since 2021, and the World Trade Organization has started to discuss plastic pollution through an informal dialogue (IDP) launched in 2020.

Plastics and Finance

To enact the systemic changes required to end global plastic pollution, financial flows must be redirected away from the linear production of virgin plastics towards the financing of circular systems that allow eliminating the use of unnecessary or problematic plastics and hazardous chemicals in favor of environmentally and chemically safe plastic materials and products (UNEP FI, 2023). The financial sector is a key enabler of a circular economy for plastics: by making better design, reusing and recycling more financially competitive, virgin plastics production levels can be abated.

On the other hand, under business-as-usual scenarios, expected increasing trends of plastic pollution and its consequent management will pose significant costs to businesses, communities, and ecosystems, with projections of plastic pollution to amount to well over 250 million metric tons annually by 2040. In spite of this, directing financial flows to activities that contribute to plastic pollution is currently often less risky than financing activities that contribute to a just and safe plastics circular economy (UNEP FI, 2023). For these reasons, a global structure to unlock finance and decrease risks associated with initiatives to combat plastic pollution is necessary.

Plastics and Agriculture

Plastics used in agriculture, or ‘agriplastics’, amount to a mere 3.5% of global plastics use, the equivalent of 12.5Million tonnes per year (EIA, 2023), yet they affect the atmosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere and biosphere. Plastics are used in farming in many forms, including plastic-coated seeds, mulch film, nets, packaging or as an additive in synthetic fertilizers and pesticides. They also make their way into biosolid fertilizer which is spread on fields. While some of the products have helped to increase productivity, there is strong evidence that these plastics are contaminating soils and thus impacting soil health, biodiversity, and productivity. In addition, plastics used in agriculture pose threats to human health, making farming workers and workers operating at the end-of-life of agriplastics particularly exposed. Researches also highlight the negative impact of agriplastics on animal and plant health. Mismanaged plastic pollution through agriculture may also end up in other environment through run-off and erosion. Read more about plastic pollution in the agriculture and what can be done to address the issue below.

Plastics and Standards

A vast array of standards play a role in shaping the plastics economy. In addition to standards on the design and characteristics of plastic products, there are standards on topics as diverse as the chemical composition of plastics and the labeling of products. An array of intellectual property standards also shape the plastics market, regulating matters such as the ownership of trademarks, industrial designs, copyright and patents on plastics and technologies relevant to waste management.

Biodegradable Plastics

Estimates show that almost 80% of all plastic ever produced has ended up either in landfills or in the natural environment (Geyer, Jambeck & Lavender Law, 2017). Although biodegradable plastics are often proposed as a solution to reduce damage on the environment, their potential to address the crisis on the long-term remains limited. This section provides relevant information on the nature and challenges of biodegradable plastics.

Life Cycle Approaches

Many of the early responses to address plastic pollution focus on the end of life stage of plastic. However, the complexity of the plastic crisis demand that we consider impacts and opportunities at each stage of the life cycle to design comprehensive solutions that will effectively limit all impacts of plastic, rather than merely displacing them. This section provides information on life cycle approaches to quantify and address the plastic crisis, sustainable consumption and production of plastics, as well as initiatives to foster a circular plastic economy.

Towards a Green Economy without Plastics

As plastics have major environmental and health impacts, many initiatives, projects and governance responses and options have been developed to tackle this major environmental problem.

The concept of ‘circular economy’ associated with plastics is often considered the necessary path to end the plastics crisis. The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) stresses that the concept requires a redefinition, which considers plastics’ composition, use and disposal. Toxic chemicals and toxic disposal practices should be decoupled from circular economy discourses, as incompatible with it, while environmental human rights should be prioritized. In addition, a truly circular model that includes plastic should encompass its alternatives as well as put a cap on production to make the recycle-reuse equation not only an alternative to virgin plastics but a necessity. Therefore, a safe circular economy needs to be toxic-free and respectful of human rights.