Bengals squatted on Germaine Pratt, because they could
How did your country report this? Share your view in the comments.
Diverging Reports Breakdown
Bengals squatted on Germaine Pratt, because they could
The Bengals have released linebacker Germaine Pratt. Pratt asked to be traded on February 12. The Bengals instead squatted on his contract for months, neither trading him nor cutting him. Pratt now makes it harder for him to find a suitable landing spot for 2025. He would have had more options if the Bengals had cut him in March.
Pratt has every right to be thinking, “Tanks fer nuttin.”
He asked to be traded on February 12. The Bengals instead squatted on his contract for months, neither trading him nor cutting him.
Releasing Pratt now makes it harder for him to find a suitable landing spot for 2025. It makes it harder for him to replace the $5.25 million he was due to make this year in Cincinnati.
It’s another example of the one-way nature of NFL contracts. The team can tear it up whenever the team wants. The player is stuck.
And the team can wait to cut the player until the player is screwed. It’s all the more reason for players to argue for the inclusion of roster bonuses or guarantees early in the league year. It forces the team to make a decision, and it allows the player who is released to get to the market before cash has been spent and roster spots have been claimed.
For Pratt, the most obvious potential destination is Indianapolis, where former Bengals defensive coordinator Lou Anuramo now runs the defense. Still, he would have had more options (and likely would have made more money) if the Bengals had cut him in March.
Bengals Dominate Offseason by Squatting on Germaine Pratt, Seizing Strategic Advantage
The Bengals released linebacker Germaine Pratt after months of inaction. The move comes after Pratt’s request for a trade back in February, highlighting the complexities of player contracts in professional football. Pratt was due $5.25 million this year, making his release financially impactful. His potential move to the Colts aligns him with former Bengals defensive coordinator Lou Anarumo. The timing of this release raises questions about the fairness of NFL contract structures.
www.nbcsports.com
The NFL landscape is shifting as the Bengals have officially released linebacker Germaine Pratt. This move comes after Pratt’s request for a trade back in February, highlighting the complexities of player contracts in professional football.
6 Key Takeaways Bengals release linebacker Germaine Pratt.
Pratt requested a trade in February.
NFL contracts favor teams over players.
Timing of release impacts player’s market options.
Potential destination for Pratt: Indianapolis.
Roster bonuses could benefit players significantly.
As of June 10, 2025, Pratt finds himself navigating a challenging free agency market after being sidelined by the Bengals’ decision to hold onto his contract for months. The timing of this release raises questions about the fairness of NFL contract structures.
Fast Answer: Germaine Pratt’s release from the Bengals complicates his future, potentially leading him to the Indianapolis Colts as teams prepare for the upcoming season.
This situation underscores a critical issue in the NFL: the imbalance between team control and player freedom. Why do teams wait until a player is in a tough spot to make such decisions? This release could limit Pratt’s options and earnings significantly.
Pratt was due $5.25 million this year, making his release financially impactful.
His potential move to the Colts aligns him with former Bengals defensive coordinator Lou Anarumo.
The timing of his release raises concerns about player rights in contract negotiations.
The NFL’s contract structure continues to spark debates about player rights and team control, affecting athletes globally.
As the NFL season approaches, fans will be eager to see where Pratt lands and how teams adapt their rosters. Stay tuned for more updates on player movements and upcoming games!