Congress introduces bill addressing national guidelines for college sports
How did your country report this? Share your view in the comments.
Diverging Reports Breakdown
Congress introduces bill addressing national guidelines for college sports
The House of Representatives is set to hold a hearing on a bill that would change the way college athletes are paid. The bill also includes a provision that would make it easier for athletes to leave college. The legislation is the latest in a series of bills that have been introduced in the past year. The House is expected to vote on the bill in the next few days, and the bill could be passed by the end of the year or early next year. It would be the first of its kind in the U.S. and would be a major change in the way the NCAA compensates athletes for their time on the field of play. It is also the first time in the history of the NCAA that it has included a provision for a student to leave school after two years.
On Wednesday, June 10, Reps. Lisa McClain, R-Mich., and Janelle Bynum, D-Ore., introduced a bill that comes shortly after Reps. Gus Bilirakis, R-Fla., and Brett Guthrie, R-Ky., circulated a discussion draft of a bill that would largely put into federal law the terms and new rules-making structure of the settlement.
The discussion draft is set to be the centerpiece of a hearing June 11 by a subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Bilirakis, who has been involved in previous college-sports bill efforts, chairs the subcommittee. Guthrie chairs the full committee.
The bill – in addition to being a bi-partisan presentation – continues recent work related to college sports from McClain, who is the current House Republican Conference chair. That makes her the GOP’s No. 4-ranking member in the House. In April, McClain introduced a bill that would prevent college athletes from being employees of their schools, conferences or an athletic association.
The discussion draft – as posted on Congress’ general resource site, Congress.gov – includes language that specifically would allow the NCAA, and potentially the new Collegiate Sports Commission, to make rules in areas that have come into legal dispute in recent years and in areas that the NCAA wants to shield from legal dispute.
The discussion draft, first reported on by The Washington Post, also includes language that would require most Division I schools to provide a series of benefits for athletes that are currently called for under NCAA and some conferences’ rules but do not have the force of federal law.
In addition, the discussion draft includes a “placeholder” section for language that likely would be connected to providing antitrust or other legal protection for various provisions.
According the discussion draft, an “interstate collegiate athletic association” would be able to “establish and enforce rules relating to … the manner in which … student athletes may be recruited” to play sports; “the transfer of a student athlete between institutions”; and “the number of seasons or length of time for which a student athlete is eligible to compete, academic standards, and code of conduct”.
The NCAA’s rules regarding when recruits can be offered money in exchange for the use of their name, image and likeness; athletes’ ability to freely transfer; and the number of seasons in which they are eligible to compete all of have been – or currently are being – addressed in federal and state courts across the country. That has raised concerns for NCAA officials about the future of rules such as those concerning academic eligibility requirements
The discussion draft also includes language that would require most Division I schools to provide a series of benefits for athletes that are currently called for under NCAA and some conferences’ rules but do not have the force of law.
These include medical coverage for athletically related injuries for at least two years after the conclusion of an athlete’s career; guaranteed financial aid that would allow an athlete to complete an undergraduate degree; and “an administrative structure that provides independent medical care and affirms the unchallengeable autonomous authority of primary athletics health care providers (team physicians and athletic trainers) to determine medical management and return-to-play decisions related to student athletes.”