Critics of law firms’ deals with Trump are starting a firm of their own
How did your country report this? Share your view in the comments.
Introduction:
The news topic “Critics of law firms’ deals with Trump are starting a firm of their own” has drawn international attention, with various media outlets providing diverse insights, historical context, political stances, and on-the-ground developments. Below is a curated overview of how different countries and media organizations have covered this topic recently.
Quick Summary:
- Abbe Lowell and two of the most vocal critics of established law firms’ deals with President Donald Trump are joining to start a new firm. The new firm is set to represent several clients who have been foes of Trump in some way and have been targeted by his administration. A source familiar with the efforts called the move “a reflection that big law firms were caught totally unprepared for — and unwilling — to meet this administration’s demands for fealty and protection money.” The firm will also represent clients involved in litigation over grant funding revoked by the Department of Government Efficiency and other parts of the administration. The move could be a “harbinger” of similar moves to come, a former Justice Department official who has connections to the big firms in Washington reported believing the move reflected increasing tensions.
- Legal veteran starts new firm to defend targets of Trump actions. Trump has targeted individual law firms with executive orders that they view as retribution. Lowell: “We are not a partisan firm. What we’re trying to do is respond to the moment, which is very different than it’s been””Our first and foremost obligation will always be to zealously represent an individual client,” Lowell says. “But by zealously representing an individual clients, if we can be a force to strengthen the overall rule of law, that’s what it’s about””These are the most powerful firms in the world,” Trump said. “We’re not trying to make a political statement. … What we are doing is responding to a very different moment in time,” he added. “It’s a very, very different time in history,” he said.
Country-by-Country Breakdown:
Original Coverage
Abbe Lowell and two of the most vocal critics of established law firms’ deals with President Donald Trump are joining to start a new firm. The new firm is set to represent several clients who have been foes of Trump in some way and have been targeted by his administration. A source familiar with the efforts called the move “a reflection that big law firms were caught totally unprepared for — and unwilling — to meet this administration’s demands for fealty and protection money.” The firm will also represent clients involved in litigation over grant funding revoked by the Department of Government Efficiency and other parts of the administration. The move could be a “harbinger” of similar moves to come, a former Justice Department official who has connections to the big firms in Washington reported believing the move reflected increasing tensions. Read full article
Legal veteran starts new firm to defend targets of Trump actions
Legal veteran starts new firm to defend targets of Trump actions. Trump has targeted individual law firms with executive orders that they view as retribution. Lowell: “We are not a partisan firm. What we’re trying to do is respond to the moment, which is very different than it’s been””Our first and foremost obligation will always be to zealously represent an individual client,” Lowell says. “But by zealously representing an individual clients, if we can be a force to strengthen the overall rule of law, that’s what it’s about””These are the most powerful firms in the world,” Trump said. “We’re not trying to make a political statement. … What we are doing is responding to a very different moment in time,” he added. “It’s a very, very different time in history,” he said. Read full article
Global Perspectives Summary:
Global media portray this story through varied cultural, economic, and political filters. While some focus on geopolitical ramifications, others highlight local impacts and human stories. Some nations frame the story around diplomatic tensions and international relations, while others examine domestic implications, public sentiment, or humanitarian concerns. This diversity of coverage reflects how national perspectives, media freedom, and journalistic priorities influence what the public learns about global events.
How did your country report this? Share your view in the comments.
Sources:
Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/critics-law-firms-deals-trump-are-starting-firm-rcna204271