Gavin Newsom blasts Judges Over Gun Ruling: ‘Slap In The Face’
How did your country report this? Share your view in the comments.
Diverging Reports Breakdown
Gavin Newsom Blasts Judges Over Gun Ruling: ‘Slap In The Face’
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that the law violated the Second Amendment. The law took effect in 2019 after voters overwhelmingly approved a ballot initiative on the issue in 2016. It was intended to help police find people who have guns illegally, such as convicted felons, people with certain mental illnesses and people with some domestic violence convictions. The California Department of Justice said the state needs “common-sense, lifesaving” laws that prevent ammunition from falling into the wrong hands. But many of the nation’s toughest gun laws are being challenged in court after a 2022 Supreme Court decision that set a new legal standard for evaluating gun laws in the United States.. The ruling upheld a lower court’s decision from last year. It wasn’t immediately clear if Thursday’s ruling would mean an end to the litigation over the law. California could ask for the case to be heard by a bigger group of judges.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
California Governor Gavin Newsom has decried a court’s decision striking down a voter-backed California law that required background checks for people who buy bullets.
In a 2-1 decision on Thursday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that the law violated the Second Amendment. The ruling upheld a lower court’s decision from last year.
Newsom called the decision a “slap in the face to the progress California has made in recent years to keep its communities safer from gun violence.”
He added that Californians “voted to require background checks on ammunition and their voices should matter.”
Newsweekcontacted Newsom’s office and California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office for further comment via emails on Friday sent outside regular business hours.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom holds a coffee on July 8, 2025 in Florence, South Carolina. California Gov. Gavin Newsom holds a coffee on July 8, 2025 in Florence, South Carolina. Sean Rayford/Getty Images
Why It Matters
The law took effect in 2019 after voters overwhelmingly approved a ballot initiative on the issue in 2016 and after the state legislature passed a bill changing requirements for buying ammunition.
The law was intended to help police find people who have guns illegally, such as convicted felons, people with certain mental illnesses and people with some domestic violence convictions. Sometimes they order kits online and assemble guns in their home. The guns don’t have serial numbers and are difficult for law enforcement to track, but the people who own them show up in background checks when they try to buy bullets.
What To Know
Judge Sandra Segal Ikuta wrote for the majority that the law “meaningfully constrains” the constitutional right to keep arms by forcing gun owners to get rechecked before each purchase of bullets.
“The right to keep and bear arms incorporates the right to operate them, which requires ammunition,” Ikuta wrote.
In his dissent, judge Jay Bybee argued that the law creates only minor hurdles to legal purchases of ammunition, and that it does not “meaningfully constrain” the right to bear arms.
All three judges on the panel were appointed by Republican presidents.
Last year, U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez decided that the law was unconstitutional because if people can’t buy bullets, they can’t use their guns for self-defense.
The law remained in effect while the state appealed the lower court’s decision.
What People Are Saying
Newsom said: “Strong gun laws save lives – and today’s decision is a slap in the face to the progress California has made in recent years to keep its communities safer from gun violence. Californians voted to require background checks on ammunition and their voices should matter.”
The California Department of Justice said the state needs “common-sense, lifesaving” laws that prevent ammunition from falling into the wrong hands.
The department said: “We are deeply disappointed in today’s ruling — a critical and lifesaving measure that closes a dangerous loophole. Our families, schools, and neighborhoods deserve nothing less than the most basic protection against preventable gun violence, and we are looking into our legal options.”
Chuck Michel, president and general counsel of the California Rifle & Pistol Association, which was part of the lawsuit against the California law, said in a statement: “This case has been a long hard fight against overreaching government gun control, but a firearm cannot be effective without the ammunition to make it operable. The state of California continues to try to strip our rights, and we continue to prove their actions are unconstitutional.”
What’s Next
It wasn’t immediately clear if Thursday’s ruling would mean an end to the litigation over the law. California could ask for the case to be heard by a bigger group of judges from the Ninth Circuit.
California has some of the nation’s toughest gun laws. But many of them are being challenged in court after a 2022 Supreme Court decision that expanded gun rights and set a new legal standard for evaluating gun laws.
This article includes reporting from The Associated Press.
Source: https://www.newsweek.com/gavin-newsom-judges-gun-ruling-2103877