Reactions to Trump’s Suggestion of Annexing Canada, Greenland, and the Panama Canal

Reactions have been strong following President-elect Donald Trump’s statements suggesting that Canada, Greenland, and the Panama Canal should become part of the United States. During a wide-ranging news conference on Tuesday, Trump did not dismiss the idea of using military force to claim Greenland from Denmark and the Panama Canal from Panama. Furthermore, he stated that U.S. economic support for Canada would be justified only if Canada became a U.S. state.

International Responses to Trump’s Annexation Proposal

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was swift to respond on X, firmly dismissing Trump’s suggestion by stating, “There isn’t a snowball’s chance in hell that Canada would become part of the United States.” In a more detailed statement, Trudeau emphasized the benefits both countries derive from their partnership in trade and security. He also countered Trump’s assertion that the U.S. does not need Canadian resources, highlighting how workers and communities on both sides benefit from their economic ties.

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen echoed Trudeau’s sentiment, stressing that “Greenland belongs to the Greenlanders” and will not be sold. Frederiksen emphasized the steadfast support among Greenland’s people to remain independent and dismissed Trump’s suggestion of the U.S. purchasing the territory.

Panama’s stance was equally resolute. During a news conference, Panamanian Foreign Minister Javier Martínez-Acha Vásquez declared the sovereignty of the Panama Canal as “nonnegotiable” and entrenched in Panama’s historic struggle. He made it clear that the canal would continue to be Panamanian.

Political and Public Reactions in the U.S.

Trump’s remarks have also stirred reactions among U.S. lawmakers. Democratic members of Congress took to X to voice their opposition. Rep. Dina Titus, D-Nev., compared Trump’s territorial ambitions to “whimsical imperialism” rather than serious foreign policy. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., pointed out that the focus should be on addressing domestic issues like the high cost of living rather than international annexation.

Similarly, Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., noted that “the American people do not want to go to war for Greenland.” While most GOP leaders remained silent, Rep. Eric Burlison, R-Mo., expressed support for Trump’s aspirations, highlighting visions of expanded U.S. territory.

White House’s Stance on Trump’s Comments

In a press briefing, White House national security spokesman John Kirby refrained from directly addressing Trump’s expansionist views, emphasizing that those were the president-elect’s personal foreign policy statements. Kirby pointed to the responses from foreign leaders involved, suggesting a self-evident understanding of their disapproval of such policy pronouncements without the White House casting additional judgment.

International Backlash and Further Reactions

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum humorously addressed Trump’s proposal to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the “Gulf of America.” In her daily briefing, she pointed to a historical map, suggesting tongue-in-cheek that North America could be renamed “América Mexicana.” Her remarks underscored the long-standing cultural and historical significance of geographical names and hinted at the absurdity of renaming long-established regions.

Spectrum News’ Joseph Konig and the Associated Press contributed to this report, adding further depth to the reactions and implications surrounding Trump’s bold territorial claims.

Key Takeaways

• Justin Trudeau: “There isn’t a snowball’s chance in hell that Canada would become part of the United States.”
• Mette Frederiksen: “Greenland is not for sale and will not be in the future either.”
• Javier Martínez-Acha Vásquez: “The sovereignty of our canal is nonnegotiable.”
• Rep. Dina Titus: Criticized Trump’s strategy as “whimsical imperialism.”
• Hakeem Jeffries: “House Democrats are focused on lowering the high cost of living in America. Not invading Greenland.”

As the world reacts to Trump’s audacious geopolitical suggestions, it is clear that these statements have sparked controversy and debate across international and domestic fronts, with foreign leaders and U.S. lawmakers voicing strong opposition and concern. The discourse around annexation underscores the importance of diplomatic relations and existing international agreements, reminding stakeholders of the complexities involved in altering sovereignty and territory in today’s interconnected world.

“`

Sources: https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2025/01/08/greenland-panama-canal-canada-trump-trudeau