The promise of electric vehicles (EVs) has long been tied to a cleaner planet. Reduced tailpipe emissions mean lower greenhouse gases. But until recently, the health benefits from improved air quality were mostly telectric vehicle health benefitsheoretical. Now, new research from the Keck School of Medicine at USC shows these advantages are already being felt across California neighborhoods.

This study is the first to use real-world data to link electric car use, cleaner air, and better health outcomes. Led by Erika Garcia and Sandrah Eckel, the team used a unique natural experiment. California’s rapid transition to electric vehicles—specifically light-duty zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs)—offered the ideal testbed.

The findings, published in Science of the Total Environment, suggest that even modest increases in ZEV adoption are already linked to fewer asthma-related emergency room visits and reduced levels of nitrogen dioxide (NO₂), a harmful pollutant tied to traffic.

The promise of electric vehicles (EVs) has long been tied to a cleaner planet. (CREDIT: iStock Images)

A cleaner shift, block by block

The team gathered data from four main sources. They examined ZEV registrations between 2013 and 2019 across California zip codes using DMV records. They also pulled air quality data from EPA monitoring sites, focusing on NO₂ levels, a gas strongly linked to car exhaust. Then, they matched this with data on asthma-related emergency visits and added educational attainment levels in each zip code as a measure of socioeconomic status.

For every increase of 20 ZEVs per 1,000 people, asthma-related ER visits dropped by 3.2%. There was also a small but measurable dip in NO₂ levels. While that might sound minor, these changes add up across large populations.

By 2019, the average number of ZEVs in California grew from 1.4 to 14.6 per 1,000 people. Still, the pace of adoption varied. Areas with more college-educated residents saw faster uptake. For instance, neighborhoods where 47% of people held bachelor’s degrees gained about 3.6 new ZEVs per 1,000 residents per year. In contrast, zip codes where only 17% held degrees saw less than one new ZEV per 1,000 people annually.

Related Stories

This uneven growth points to what researchers call an “adoption gap.” The communities hit hardest by pollution—those with lower incomes or fewer resources—are being left behind.

“These are the same communities that already bear the brunt of traffic-related air pollution,” said Garcia, an assistant professor of population and public health sciences. “If these findings hold up in future studies, it’s vital that they benefit from cleaner technology too.”

Asthma, air, and equity

The link between traffic pollution and asthma is well established. Exposure to NO₂, a key marker of vehicle emissions, increases asthma risks and worsens attacks. It can also harm heart health, brain function, and more. In the U.S., asthma costs around $56 billion each year, including $50 billion in direct health care costs.

Graphic abstract. The transition to electric vehicles is projected to have considerable public health co-benefits. (CREDIT: Science of The Total Environment)

People from low-income backgrounds and historically marginalized groups suffer the most. They’re more likely to live near busy roads, have limited access to care, and face environmental stressors that compound health problems. These factors also mean they’re more likely to end up in the ER with asthma attacks.

That’s why the study’s focus on ER visits is so important. “Asthma is a leading chronic illness and a good early signal for how cleaner air affects health,” said Eckel, a senior author on the study. “Fewer emergency visits could also mean lower costs and less strain on the health system.”

An early look at a long journey

California is a pioneer in EV adoption and home to some of the worst traffic-related pollution in the country. This made it the perfect location for an “ecologic study” like this one, where broad trends are analyzed across many zip codes.

The team’s data covered the years before the COVID-19 pandemic, so the results weren’t skewed by lockdowns or changes in driving patterns. Their careful methods included sensitivity checks to confirm the results held up under different conditions.

Longitudinal trends, from 2013 to 2019 in: (a) number of zero-emissions vehicles (ZEVs) per 1000 population in 1238 California zip codes, (b) annual average nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentrations observed at 107 California monitoring stations, and (c) annual age-adjusted rate of asthma-related emergency department (ED) visits per 10,000 in 1238 California zip codes. (CREDIT: Science of The Total Environment)

Still, this is just the start. The researchers stress that more studies are needed. For one, current data doesn’t include other pollutants like ozone or fine particles smaller than 2.5 microns (PM2.5), which are also harmful to lungs. Brake and tire wear from EVs still produce particles. And the environmental costs of mining, manufacturing, and disposal of EV components must be considered.

“We’re excited about shifting the conversation toward climate change solutions that help right now,” Eckel said. “And these early results show that ZEVs can be one key part of that.”

Closing the adoption gap

While the shift to EVs offers benefits, barriers still block widespread access in underserved areas. These include high upfront costs, limited charging stations, and concerns about battery range. Some drivers don’t know about financial incentives or worry about long-term maintenance.

Crude association between predicted 7-year change in nitrogen dioxide (NO2) versus 7-year change in number of zero-emissions vehicles (ZEVs) based on data from 102 air monitoring sites in 91 zip codes in California. (CREDIT: Science of The Total Environment)

Addressing these concerns is not just about technology—it’s about justice. “Communities overburdened with pollution need to see the most benefits,” Garcia said. “Otherwise, we risk deepening the inequality we’re trying to fix.”

Broader efforts are needed alongside the ZEV push. Expanding access to clean public transport, walkable neighborhoods, and bike-friendly infrastructure can boost both health and sustainability.

This study shows the payoff from even early-phase EV adoption. As more electric cars hit the road, the potential for healthier, cleaner communities grows. But the path forward must be equitable, or we risk leaving those most in need behind.

Note: The article above provided above by The Brighter Side of News.