India lost jets in Operation Sindoor due to ‘political constraint’: Defence attaché to Indonesia
How did your country report this? Share your view in the comments.
Diverging Reports Breakdown
India lost jets in Operation Sindoor due to ‘political constraint’: Defence attaché to Indonesia
The Indian Air Force lost fighter jets to Pakistan during Operation Sindoor on May 7 because the political leadership had directed that no military establishment across the border was to be attacked that day. A purported video of Captain Shiv Kumar’s remarks from June 10 surfaced online on Sunday. The Indian Embassy in Jakarta stated that the Navy officer had only said that the Indian armed forces serve under “ civilian political leadership ”, unlike some neighbouring countries. It also said that Kumar’s remarks were “quoted out of context” and “the media reports are a misrepresentation of the intention and thrust of the presentation made by the speaker’’ The statement came more than a month after Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan”s May 31 comments that were seen by some as an acknowledgement of the loss of aircraft during the operation.
A controversy erupted after a purported video of Captain Shiv Kumar’s remarks from June 10 surfaced online on Sunday.
Following this, the Indian Embassy in Jakarta stated that the Navy officer had only said that India’s armed forces serve under “ civilian political leadership ”, unlike some neighbouring countries.
“It was also explained that the objective of Operation Sindoor was to target terrorist infrastructure and the Indian response was non-escalatory,” it added.
The Indian Embassy also said that Kumar’s remarks were “quoted out of context” and “the media reports are a misrepresentation of the intention and thrust of the presentation made by the speaker”.
The officer had made the comments while speaking at a seminar titled “Analysis of the Pakistan-India Air Battle and Indonesia’s Anticipatory Strategies from the Perspective of Air Power” at a university in Jakarta.
Kumar’s statement came more than a month after Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan’s May 31 comments that were seen by some as an acknowledgement of the Indian Air Force’s loss of aircraft during the operation. General Chauhan had told Bloomberg that what was important was “not the jet being down, but why they were being down”.
The Narendra Modi-led Union government has yet to officially state the number of fighter jets lost during Operation Sindoor.
Kumar made the statement in response to Pakistan’s claim of having downed six aircraft, including three Rafales.
“I may not agree…that India lost so many aircraft,” The Print quoted him as having said. “But, I do agree that we did lose some aircraft and that happened only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack the military establishments”.
Kumar added that the tactics were changed after the loss and “we went for their military installations”.
After a video from the seminar surfaced online, the Congress accused the Union government of having “misled” the country.
Congress General Secretary Jairam Ramesh, in a social media pos,t asked why the prime minister was “refusing” to preside over an all-party meeting to take the Opposition into confidence and why the demand for a special session of Parliament has been rejected.
He added: “First the Chief of Defence Staff makes important revelations in Singapore. Then a senior defence official follows up from Indonesia.”
Tensions between New Delhi and Islamabad escalated on May 7 when the Indian military carried out strikes – codenamed Operation Sindoor – on what it claimed were terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.
The strikes were in response to the terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pahalgam, which killed 26 persons on April 22.
The Pakistan Army retaliated to Indian strikes by repeatedly shelling Indian villages along the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir. At least 22 Indian civilians and eight defence personnel were killed in the shelling.
India and Pakistan on May 10 reached an “understanding” to halt firing following the four-day conflict.
The Indian government has maintained that Operation Sindoor targeted only terror camps, intentionally avoiding military installations.
New Delhi has consistently maintained that Islamabad initiated the escalation ladder, and the Indian military responded with proportionate force each time.
IAF lost jets during Op Sindoor over ‘political constraint’, says def attache; quoted out of context: Govt
India’s defence attache to Indonesia admitted that the Air Force lost “some aircraft” early on in Operation Sindoor. The remark stoked controversy back home, prompting the Indian Embassy in Jakarta to issue a sternly-worded clarification. Pakistan, meanwhile, has claimed to have downed six Indian fighter jets, including three Rafales — a claim the Indian military leadership has outrightly dismissed as “absolutely incorrect” The Indian embassy in Indonesia swiftly issued a clarification, asserting that Capt Kumar’s remarks were “quoted out of context” and that the media had “misrepresented the intention and thrust of the presentation”
Captain Shiv Kumar, India’s Defence Attache to Indonesia and a senior Navy officer, disclosed that the Indian Air Force (IAF) lost several fighter jets during the May 7 aerial offensive against terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) — a setback he attributed to political constraints that forbade the targeting of military establishments and air defences across the border.
Speaking at a seminar on June 10 titled “Analysis of the Pakistan-India Air Battle and Indonesia’s Anticipatory Strategies from the Perspective of Air Power”, Capt Kumar admitted, “I may not agree (with an earlier Indonesian speaker’s claim) that we lost so many aircraft, but I do agree we did lose some aircraft and that happened only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack their military establishments and air defences.”
This candid admission comes in the wake of Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) General Anil Chauhan’s May 31 address in Singapore, where he acknowledged early losses during Operation Sindoor, though he refrained from disclosing specific figures. “What I can say is that on May 7, in the initial stages, there were losses. Numbers are not important. What was important is why did these losses occur, and what we will do after that,” the CDS had remarked.
Pakistan, meanwhile, has claimed to have downed six Indian fighter jets, including three Rafales — a claim the Indian military leadership has outrightly dismissed as “absolutely incorrect.”
Capt Kumar further explained how India recalibrated its strategy post the initial setbacks. “After the loss, we changed our tactics and we went for the military installations (and radar sites). So, we first achieved suppression of enemy air defences and then that’s why all our attacks could easily go through using Brahmos missiles (on May 10).”
Quoted out of context: Govt clarifies
His remarks, however, triggered a fresh political storm back home, with the Congress party seizing the opportunity to criticise the Modi government’s handling of the high-stakes operation. In response, the Indian Embassy in Indonesia swiftly issued a clarification, asserting that Capt Kumar’s remarks were “quoted out of context” and that the media had “misrepresented the intention and thrust of the presentation.”
“The presentation conveyed that the Indian armed forces serve under civilian political leadership, unlike some other countries in our neighbourhood. It was also explained that the objective of Operation Sindoor was to target terrorist infrastructure and the Indian response was non-escalatory,” the embassy posted on X.