Opinion Contributor

AI-assisted summary Kentucky’s HB 136 extends environmental audit privilege to Louisville’s Air Pollution Control District (APCD), allowing companies to avoid penalties for self-reported violations.

West Louisville residents fear HB 136 will worsen air quality due to decreased enforcement, potentially increasing health risks.

The bill’s sponsor, Rep. Jared Bauman, works for a company regulated by the APCD, raising ethical concerns despite an advisory opinion clearing him of conflict of interest.

HB 136 highlights the ongoing tension between economic development and environmental protection in Kentucky.

In 2024, the Kentucky General Assembly passed House Bill 136 (HB 136), a piece of legislation sparking significant debate regarding its environmental and ethical ramifications. HB 136 is of particular significance for West Louisville — a community historically burdened by industrial pollution.

HB 136, introduced by Rep. Jared Bauman (R-Louisville), extends the “environmental audit privilege” to the Louisville Air Pollution Control District (APCD), allowing companies that voluntarily disclose and rectify environmental violations to avoid civil penalties. This privilege was previously available in all Kentucky counties except Jefferson County, which suffers uniquely problematic air pollution conditions.

West Louisville, particularly the Rubbertown area, is home to numerous chemical plants and has long faced environmental justice challenges. Residents have expressed concerns that HB 136 could exacerbate existing pollution issues by reducing the APCD’s ability to enforce penalties, potentially leading to decreased air quality and public health risks. Moreover, HB 136 may encourage the chemical companies to increase risks and emissions to the detriment of the fence-line and surrounding communities.

Ethical implications of HB 136 have been a point of controversy

There is argument that the bill may roll back proactive pollution control measures, as companies might rely on self-reporting to avoid fines. While an amendment was added to allow the APCD to issue penalties for repeated violations over a five-year period, environmental advocates worry this may not sufficiently deter noncompliance. Companies may simply avoid repeated violations to reach the fifth year, placing the community at risk within the five-year period.

Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle.

The ethical implications of HB 136 have been a focal point of controversy. Rep. Bauman, the bill’s sponsor, is employed by Lubrizol Corporation, a chemical manufacturer operating in Rubbertown and regulated by the APCD. During legislative hearings, Bauman declined to disclose his employer, stating, “I don’t think that’s relevant.” If a decision made by a public official benefits the individual, business or employer, it’s definitely relevant. Its concerning for a legislator to sponsor a bill that benefits their business or employer to believe it has no relevance.

Although Bauman obtained an advisory opinion from the Legislative Ethics Commission indicating no conflict of interest — since the bill applies broadly to all industries — critics argue that his dual role raises questions about the integrity of the legislative process. Ethics experts contend that even the appearance of a conflict can undermine public trust in government.

Equitable and transparent policymaking in KY remains urgent

HB 136’s passage reflects a broader tension between economic development and environmental protection. Supporters assert that the bill promotes regulatory consistency and encourages improved industry compliance. However, opponents caution that reduced enforcement capabilities may lead to increased pollution, particularly in vulnerable communities like West Louisville, which directly border these facilities.

The ethical debates surrounding HB 136 also highlight the need for transparency and accountability in policymaking. Ensuring that legislators disclose potential conflicts of interest is crucial for maintaining public confidence and safeguarding the interests of all constituents.

Kentucky’s HB 136 serves as a case study in balancing industrial interests with environmental justice and ethical governance. As West Louisville residents and environmental advocates continue to monitor the bill’s implementation, the broader conversation about equitable and transparent policymaking remains more pertinent than ever. The quality of our lives and environment is dependent on ethical decision-making and policies.

Agree or disagree? Submit a letter to the editor.

Donovan C. Taylor is a West End community native and resident committed to enhancing the area through collaborations with residents, community groups, businesses and other stakeholders. He is a graduate of Central High School, Florida A&M University (BS, MBA) and University of Kentucky College of Law (JD).