Legislation to Restore Michigan’s Environmental Protection Act

The Michigan Legislature is currently considering crucial bills aimed at revitalizing a significant portion of the Michigan Environmental Protection Act. This move seeks to lift the existing ban on the Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE)’s ability to draft new rules addressing water pollution, a restriction that has been in place for nearly two decades.

The Historical Context

About 20 years ago, a political compromise between a Republican-majority Legislature and Democratic Governor Jennifer Granholm limited the regulatory power of Michigan’s environmental agency. While the department could raise fees on businesses for pollution programs, it was barred from creating new rules related to water pollution concerns under Part 31 of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act. This prohibition has remained in effect since December 31, 2006.

The Current Legislative Effort

Now, as the state approaches another legislative session, there is a push, particularly during the lame duck session, to amend the existing Act. This initiative is spearheaded by House Bill 5205 and Senate Bill 663, with support from legislators such as Democratic Representative Emily Dievendorf and Democratic Senator Susan Shink. These bills aim to grant EGLE the authority to update and implement regulations crucial for safeguarding Michigan’s water resources.

The Importance of Restoring Authority

The restoration of EGLE’s authority is not just a legislative technicality; it represents a pressing need to align state regulations with current scientific understanding and federal standards. Since the curtailment of its powers, EGLE has struggled to address emerging environmental threats, such as the pollutants known as PFAS, which have become a significant concern for both public health and environmental sustainability.

Support and Opposition

The Michigan Environmental Council, represented by Megan Tinsley, strongly advocates for the legislation, emphasizing its potential to reinstate EGLE’s protective role over Michigan’s waters. However, opposition exists, notably from the Michigan Farm Bureau, which perceives the legislation as a means to dramatically increase EGLE’s regulatory reach instead of simply restoring it. Legislative Counsel Ben Tirrell articulates their stance, highlighting the need for regulatory processes grounded in economic and scientific rationale.

Potential Impact on EGLE’s Powers

If passed, the legislation would restore EGLE’s regulatory authority under Part 31 to a level consistent with other sections of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act. This alignment would potentially enable EGLE to enhance its regulatory framework to effectively manage and mitigate water pollution challenges.

Key Considerations for Stakeholders

• Democratic Party Dynamics: The Democratic majority must act swiftly to ensure that the bill is passed within the duration of the lame duck session.
• Public Health and Environmental Safety: Restored regulatory power would allow the state to tackle lingering pollution threats and safeguard public health effectively.
• Economic and Scientific Balance: While strengthening regulatory frameworks is crucial, stakeholders insist that these actions be economically viable and scientifically validated.
• Stakeholder Engagement: Active engagement with various stakeholders, including environmental groups and agricultural interests, remains essential to create balanced and effective regulations.

The Road Ahead

As the bills progress through the legislative process, the conversation around the balance of power, environmental protection, and economic considerations will undoubtedly shape their outcome. For the supporters of the legislation, its passage represents an urgent correction to past restrictions, aligning Michigan’s environmental safeguards with contemporary standards and public health needs.

Conclusion

The restoration of EGLE’s authority to draft and implement new water pollution rules would be a milestone in Michigan’s environmental policy. By navigating the complexities of legislative politics and stakeholder interests, the aim is to reinforce the state’s commitment to protecting its vital water resources, ensuring a healthier environment and a resilient ecosystem for future generations.

WDET remains committed to providing trustworthy, accurate, and up-to-date journalism that is accessible to everyone. As a public media institution, we rely on independent support from our readership. If you value our efforts, consider making a gift today.

Source: https://wdet.org/2024/12/09/legislation-would-restore-a-portion-of-michigans-environmental-protection-act/