Private organizations step up to do science that was cut back by the Trump administration

Private organizations step up to do science that was cut back by the Trump administration

How did your country report this? Share your view in the comments.

Introduction:

The news topic “Private organizations step up to do science that was cut back by the Trump administration” has drawn international attention, with various media outlets providing diverse insights, historical context, political stances, and on-the-ground developments. Below is a curated overview of how different countries and media organizations have covered this topic recently.

Quick Summary:

  • The Trump administration notified researchers earlier this week that their work was no longer needed on the National Climate Assessment. The report’s future is no longer clear and some authors have expressed concern that it will be whittled down, unscientific or inadequate in expressing the risks of climate change. The American Geophysical Union and American Meteorological Society announced Friday that they would develop a special collection of research focused on climate. The new collection, to be spread among more than two dozen peer-reviewed journals, is designed to “sustain the momentum” of the work being done on the report, the organizations said. The White House declined to comment on why the authors were released, and what the administration’s plans are for the report. The U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) is required to submit a report every four years to the president.
  • President Trump’s 2026 budget plan would slash nondefense domestic spending by $163 billion while increasing expenditures on national security. White House officials have in recent weeks brainstormed strategies for enshrining into law the government cuts implemented by billionaire Elon Musk. Republicans have in private conversations made clear that it would be difficult to codify even a small fraction of the measures that Musk’s team unilaterally implemented, according to lawmakers and several other people familiar with the discussions. GOP members of Congress have also raised concerns about tackling cuts as Republicans are trying to corral their rowdy and tiny majorities into extending tax cuts in one “big, beautiful bill” that President Trump has demanded. The impasse over DOGE reflects a looming challenge for the administration’s vision of a sprawling overhaul of federal agencies.
  • The Trump administration notified researchers earlier this week that their work was no longer needed on the National Climate Assessment. The report’s future is no longer clear and some authors have expressed concern that it will be whittled down, unscientific or inadequate in expressing the risks of climate change. The American Geophysical Union (AGU) and American Meteorological Society (AMS) announced Friday that they would develop a special collection of research focused on climate. The new collection, to be spread among more than two dozen peer-reviewed journals, is designed to “sustain the momentum” of the work being done on the report, the AGU said. The White House declined to comment on record on why National Climate assessment authors were released.

Country-by-Country Breakdown:

Original Coverage

The Trump administration notified researchers earlier this week that their work was no longer needed on the National Climate Assessment. The report’s future is no longer clear and some authors have expressed concern that it will be whittled down, unscientific or inadequate in expressing the risks of climate change. The American Geophysical Union and American Meteorological Society announced Friday that they would develop a special collection of research focused on climate. The new collection, to be spread among more than two dozen peer-reviewed journals, is designed to “sustain the momentum” of the work being done on the report, the organizations said. The White House declined to comment on why the authors were released, and what the administration’s plans are for the report. The U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) is required to submit a report every four years to the president. Read full article

White House comes out with sharp spending cuts: See a recap

President Trump’s 2026 budget plan would slash nondefense domestic spending by $163 billion while increasing expenditures on national security. White House officials have in recent weeks brainstormed strategies for enshrining into law the government cuts implemented by billionaire Elon Musk. Republicans have in private conversations made clear that it would be difficult to codify even a small fraction of the measures that Musk’s team unilaterally implemented, according to lawmakers and several other people familiar with the discussions. GOP members of Congress have also raised concerns about tackling cuts as Republicans are trying to corral their rowdy and tiny majorities into extending tax cuts in one “big, beautiful bill” that President Trump has demanded. The impasse over DOGE reflects a looming challenge for the administration’s vision of a sprawling overhaul of federal agencies. Read full article

Private organizations step up to do science that was cut back by the Trump administration

The Trump administration notified researchers earlier this week that their work was no longer needed on the National Climate Assessment. The report’s future is no longer clear and some authors have expressed concern that it will be whittled down, unscientific or inadequate in expressing the risks of climate change. The American Geophysical Union (AGU) and American Meteorological Society (AMS) announced Friday that they would develop a special collection of research focused on climate. The new collection, to be spread among more than two dozen peer-reviewed journals, is designed to “sustain the momentum” of the work being done on the report, the AGU said. The White House declined to comment on record on why National Climate assessment authors were released. Read full article

Private firms are trying to fill research gaps, but their ‘puny’ budgets are no match for federal funds

The federal government has slashed research since Donald Trump took office. Now, some private companies said they want to pick up strands of research that might have otherwise been funded by the federal government. The effort has stoked little optimism among experts, who caution that private efforts cannot remotely replicate the breadth, depth or public service provided by federal funding. The NIH is the world’s largest public funder of biomedical and behavioral research. It had a $48bn budget and funded projects into nearly every area of medicine imaginable – including administration bugbears such as fluoride and vaccine safety. In the first few months of the administration, the health secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr and billionaire Elon Musk’s unofficial “department of government effiute’ have begun cutting back on the NIH’S budget. Read full article

What is Doge and why is Musk stepping back?

Elon Musk has pledged to “significantly” cut back his role in Doge. The body is tasked with reducing US government spending and cutting jobs. Doge is not an official government department, which can only be established by Congress. Instead the advisory body was created by an executive order signed by US President Donald Trump. Part of Doge’s mission, according to the order, relates to IT upgrades aimed at boosting efficiency. It must finish its work by July 2026. Many Doge staff appear to be young people with tech backgrounds and limited or no government experience. Musk initially said he would perform his role as an outside volunteer but the White House later confirmed he would operate as an unpaid special government employee. Musk denied leading a “hostile takeover” of the US government, and defended his approach. He also made a number of exaggerated claims about his role. Read full article

Global Perspectives Summary:

Global media portray this story through varied cultural, economic, and political filters. While some focus on geopolitical ramifications, others highlight local impacts and human stories. Some nations frame the story around diplomatic tensions and international relations, while others examine domestic implications, public sentiment, or humanitarian concerns. This diversity of coverage reflects how national perspectives, media freedom, and journalistic priorities influence what the public learns about global events.

How did your country report this? Share your view in the comments.

Sources:

Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/science/climate-change/private-organizations-step-science-was-cut-back-trump-administration-rcna204503

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *