The Danger for India and Pakistan Has Not Gone Away
How did your country report this? Share your view in the comments.
Introduction:
The news topic “The Danger for India and Pakistan Has Not Gone Away” has drawn international attention, with various media outlets providing diverse insights, historical context, political stances, and on-the-ground developments. Below is a curated overview of how different countries and media organizations have covered this topic recently.
Quick Summary:
- India and Pakistan have seemingly pulled back from the brink again. But so much was new about the nuclear-armed enemies’ chaotic four-day clash, and so many of the underlying accelerants remain volatile, that there’s little to suggest that the truce represents any return to old patterns of restraint. A new generation of military technology fueled a dizzying aerial escalation. Waves of airstrikes and antiaircraft volleys with modern weapons set the stage. Soon they were joined by weaponized drones en masse for the first time both along the two countries’ extensive boundaries and deep into their territory. Only then did international diplomacy — a crucial factor in past pullbacks between India and Pakistan — seem to engage in earnest. In a new global chapter defined by perilous conflicts, distracted leaders and a retreating sense of international responsibility to keep peace, the safety net had never seemed thinner.
- Pakistan had nurtured the illusion of ‘Bleed India’ under the guise of nuclear weapons, which India has demolished with the operation. The message has gone to Pakistan in clear words that India can enter its house whenever it wants. The largest attack by India was carried out in Rawalpindi, where the headquarters of the Pakistani army (GHQ) is located. The RawalPindi airbase, which is only 12 kilometers away from the GHQ, was demolished by India. The biggest lesson of Operation Sindoor that India has taught Pakistan is that despite having nuclear bombs, it can enter their territory and can punish them. India did not use full capacity weapons in its attack but used very few destructive weapons. India has completely destroyed crucial properties of the Pakistan Air Force.
- The most likely outcome is that the latest deadly flare-up between India and Pakistan will end relatively soon. In the little over 25 years that the two countries have possessed nuclear weapons, both have become very good at engaging in tense and violent confrontations. Neither side has yet sent ground troops into the other’s territory, which would be the clearest sign yet of a wider war. India launched missile attacks into Pakistan in response to a brutal massacre of tourists in April by militants that the Indian government alleges have links to the Pakistani state. Some analysts are describing the current conflict as the most dangerous episode of violence since the Kargil War of 1999, in which hundreds of troops were killed on both sides. But just because the two sides don’t want the crisis to escalate doesn’t mean it won’t anyway.
Country-by-Country Breakdown:
Original Coverage
India and Pakistan have seemingly pulled back from the brink again. But so much was new about the nuclear-armed enemies’ chaotic four-day clash, and so many of the underlying accelerants remain volatile, that there’s little to suggest that the truce represents any return to old patterns of restraint. A new generation of military technology fueled a dizzying aerial escalation. Waves of airstrikes and antiaircraft volleys with modern weapons set the stage. Soon they were joined by weaponized drones en masse for the first time both along the two countries’ extensive boundaries and deep into their territory. Only then did international diplomacy — a crucial factor in past pullbacks between India and Pakistan — seem to engage in earnest. In a new global chapter defined by perilous conflicts, distracted leaders and a retreating sense of international responsibility to keep peace, the safety net had never seemed thinner. Read full article
India shatters Pakistan’s ‘Bleed India’ doctrine, wipes away Islamabad’s nuclear threat; what does it mean now? Is Pakistan planning…
Pakistan had nurtured the illusion of ‘Bleed India’ under the guise of nuclear weapons, which India has demolished with the operation. The message has gone to Pakistan in clear words that India can enter its house whenever it wants. The largest attack by India was carried out in Rawalpindi, where the headquarters of the Pakistani army (GHQ) is located. The RawalPindi airbase, which is only 12 kilometers away from the GHQ, was demolished by India. The biggest lesson of Operation Sindoor that India has taught Pakistan is that despite having nuclear bombs, it can enter their territory and can punish them. India did not use full capacity weapons in its attack but used very few destructive weapons. India has completely destroyed crucial properties of the Pakistan Air Force. Read full article
Just how bad can the India-Pakistan crisis get?
The most likely outcome is that the latest deadly flare-up between India and Pakistan will end relatively soon. In the little over 25 years that the two countries have possessed nuclear weapons, both have become very good at engaging in tense and violent confrontations. Neither side has yet sent ground troops into the other’s territory, which would be the clearest sign yet of a wider war. India launched missile attacks into Pakistan in response to a brutal massacre of tourists in April by militants that the Indian government alleges have links to the Pakistani state. Some analysts are describing the current conflict as the most dangerous episode of violence since the Kargil War of 1999, in which hundreds of troops were killed on both sides. But just because the two sides don’t want the crisis to escalate doesn’t mean it won’t anyway. Read full article
Kashmir: What’s the way out of the India and Pakistan crisis?
Nations around the world are urging calm as the India-Pakistan crisis takes a dangerous turn. Initial thinking was that after India launched air strikes, and with Pakistan claiming to have shot down several Indian jets – both sides could claim “victory” and de-escalate. But there’s a danger that any protracted tit-for-tat attacks could lead them to a far more damaging prospect. US Vice-President JD Vance has said that a potential war between India and Pakistan would be “none of our business” The neighbours are closer to war than in recent decades. “The World community is keeping quiet; that’s dangerous,” Ayesha Siddiqa, a Pakistani academic who is a senior fellow at King’s College London said. ‘Though the flare up has been happening for decades, this is the first time the two countries find themselves in a conflict without anyone monitoring them or forcefully telling them to stop,’ she said. Read full article
Global Perspectives Summary:
Global media portray this story through varied cultural, economic, and political filters. While some focus on geopolitical ramifications, others highlight local impacts and human stories. Some nations frame the story around diplomatic tensions and international relations, while others examine domestic implications, public sentiment, or humanitarian concerns. This diversity of coverage reflects how national perspectives, media freedom, and journalistic priorities influence what the public learns about global events.
How did your country report this? Share your view in the comments.
Sources:
- Original Article
- India shatters Pakistan’s ‘Bleed India’ doctrine, wipes away Islamabad’s nuclear threat; what does it mean now? Is Pakistan planning…
- Just how bad can the India-Pakistan crisis get?
- Kashmir: What’s the way out of the India and Pakistan crisis?
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/11/world/asia/india-pakistan-war-analysis.html