Trump Administration files a second complaint against a federal judge
How did your country report this? Share your view in the comments.
Diverging Reports Breakdown
Trump Administration files a second complaint against a federal judge
US District Court Judge James Boasberg is at the center of cases involving the administration’s use of a colonial-era law to send undocumented immigrants to a notorious prison in El Salvador. The Department of Justice has filed a misconduct complaint against him. The complaint alleges that he made comments about President Donald Trump at a Judicial Conference meeting in March that “undermined the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.” The move is yet another escalation in the Trump administration’s conflicts with the judiciary and comes after the department accused a judge of misconduct earlier this year. It’s extremely unusual for the Justice Department to complain formally about a judge”s behavior rather than pursue its agenda through the court system directly. The House of Representatives has impeached only 15 federal judges since 1803, and of those impeached were followed by convictions in the Senate, according to New York University’S Brennan Center for the Humanities. The judge was previously named to the DC district court by former President George W. Bush and was known for giving lenient punishments to rioters.
The Department of Justice has filed a misconduct complaint against US District Court Judge James Boasberg – marking another formal challenge against a federal judge who has pushed back on the Trump administration’s policies.
The complaint, submitted Monday and obtained by CNN, alleges that Boasberg, the DC judge at the center of cases involving the administration’s use of a colonial-era law to send undocumented immigrants to a notorious prison in El Salvador, made comments about President Donald Trump at a Judicial Conference meeting in March that “undermined the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.”
“While there, Judge Boasberg attempted to improperly influence Chief Justice (John) Roberts and roughly two dozen other federal judges by straying from the traditional topics to express his belief that the Trump Administration would ‘disregard rulings of federal courts’ and trigger ‘a constitutional crisis,’” Attorney General Pamela Bondi’s chief of staff, Chad Mizelle, said in the complaint.
“Although his comments would be inappropriate even if they had some basis, they were even worse because Judge Boasberg had no basis,” Mizelle argued, insisting that the Trump administration has complied with court orders.
The complaint alleges that days after making the statements, Boasberg “began acting on his preconceived belief that the Trump Administration would not follow court orders,” pointing to the judge’s order restricting the administration’s use of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act.
The Federalist reported on Boasberg’s remarks at the conference earlier this month, citing a memorandum it obtained. In response to the concerns raised by Boasberg at the conference, “Chief Justice Roberts expressed hope that would not happen and in turn no constitutional crisis would materialize,” according to the memorandum.
Bondi said on social media Monday night the complaint came at her direction, arguing that Boasberg’s “comments have undermined the integrity of the judiciary, and we will not stand for that.”
CNN has reached out to Boasberg for comment.
The move is yet another escalation in the Trump administration’s conflicts with the judiciary and comes after the Department of Justice filed another misconduct complaint against a DC district court judge earlier this year. In February, the department accused Judge Ana Reyes of misconduct during hearings over Trump’s executive order that called for banning transgender troops from serving in the US military, the Associated Press reported.
The complaint against Boasberg asks the chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Sri Srinivasan, to refer the complaint to a special investigative committee, reassign Boasberg’s relevant cases to another judge, and “impose appropriate disciplinary action, including a public reprimand and referral to the Judicial Conference for consideration of impeachment-related recommendations, if the committee finds willful misconduct.”
It’s extremely unusual for the Justice Department to complain formally about a judge’s behavior rather than pursue its agenda through the court system directly. It is also unusual for a public debate to erupt around conversations between judges, which rarely come to light, at their private annual events.
Trump’s rhetoric opposing the judiciary has been far more aggressive than during his first term. In March, Trump labeled Boasberg a “Radical Left Lunatic Judge” and called for his impeachment on social media. The action drew a rare rebuke from Roberts, who made a highly unusual statement shortly after Trump’s posts.
“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision,” Roberts said in a statement released by the Supreme Court at the time. “The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”
Federal judges hold lifetime appointments, and their impeachment and removal is extremely rare. The House of Representatives has impeached only 15 federal judges since 1803, and eight of those impeachments were followed by convictions in the Senate, according to New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice.
Boasberg had a relatively nonpartisan record before facing Trump’s fury, CNN has previously reported. He was appointed to the DC district court by former President Barack Obama and was previously named to DC’s local courts by former President George W. Bush.
Boasberg was known for giving lenient punishments to January 6 rioters. In Trump’s first term, he released FISA court materials that exposed huge problems with the FBI’s probe into connections between Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russia’s election meddling. He also paved the way for conservative groups to obtain some of Hillary Clinton’s emails from her private server.
CNN’s Hannah Rabinowitz, Katelyn Polantz, Tierney Sneed, John Fritze, Marshall Cohen and Casey Gannon contributed to this report.
US Justice Department Files Complaint Against Judge James Boasberg Amid Trump Administration Conflict
The U.S. Department of Justice has filed a new complaint against federal judge James Boasberg. The judge, who serves in the District of Columbia, is known for rulings that contradict the administration’s policies. The complaint alleges that the judge made statements about President Donald Trump during the Judicial Conference in March that “undermined the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.” The move is part of an escalation in the conflict between the Trump administration and the judiciary, as earlier this year the Department of justice had already filed a complaint against Judge Ana Reyes. Only 15 judges have been impeached since 1803, and only eight cases ended in conviction by the Senate.
The U.S. Department of Justice has filed a new complaint against federal judge James Boasberg, marking another stage in the conflict between the Trump administration and the judiciary. The judge, who serves in the District of Columbia, is known for rulings that contradict the administration’s policies.
The complaint, filed on Monday, alleges that Boasberg made statements about President Donald Trump during the Judicial Conference in March that “undermined the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.”
“During the event, Judge Boasberg attempted to improperly influence Chief Justice (John) Roberts and about two dozen other federal judges by departing from traditional topics to express the belief that the Trump administration ‘would ignore federal court rulings’ and cause a ‘constitutional crisis.’” – Chad Mizell, Chief of Staff to Attorney General Pamela Bondi
Mizell emphasized that the judge’s comments were inappropriate, as they had no basis, and that the Trump administration complied with court orders.
The complaint states that following these remarks, Boasberg began acting based on a biased belief that the administration would not enforce court decisions, including limiting the use of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act.
According to information obtained by The Federalist, the judge also made similar remarks at the conference, to which Chief Justice Roberts expressed hope that a constitutional crisis would not occur.
“Chief Justice Roberts expressed hope that this would not happen, and accordingly, that a constitutional crisis would not take place.” – Judicial Conference Memorandum
Attorney General Pamela Bondi confirmed that the complaint was filed under her direction, noting that Boasberg’s comments undermine the integrity of the judicial system.
This move is part of an escalation in the conflict between the Trump administration and the judiciary, as earlier this year the Department of Justice had already filed a complaint against Judge Ana Reyes.
The complaint against Boasberg calls on the Chief Judge of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals to refer the matter to a special investigative committee and to take disciplinary action if intentional misconduct is found.
Official complaints against judges are rare, and such matters usually remain confidential. Trump’s rhetoric toward the judiciary has become more aggressive than during his first term, when he called Boasberg a “radical left-wing crazy judge.”
“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement with a court decision. There is an ordinary appellate process for that purpose.” – John Roberts, Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court
Impeachment of federal judges is extremely rare. Only 15 judges have been impeached since 1803, and only eight cases ended in conviction by the Senate.
Before the conflict with the Trump administration, Boasberg had a reputation as a nonpartisan judge appointed by Barack Obama, and earlier by George W. Bush. He is known for moderate sentences for participants in the January 6 riots and for releasing materials that revealed issues in the FBI’s investigation into Trump’s campaign.
Source: https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/28/politics/boasberg-misconduct-complaint