Trump proposes smallest National Science Foundation budget in decades

Trump proposes smallest National Science Foundation budget in decades

How did your country report this? Share your view in the comments.

Introduction:

The news topic “Trump proposes smallest National Science Foundation budget in decades” has drawn international attention, with various media outlets providing diverse insights, historical context, political stances, and on-the-ground developments. Below is a curated overview of how different countries and media organizations have covered this topic recently.

Quick Summary:

  • U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposed fiscal year 2026 budget would cut 56% to the National Science Foundation, 47% to NASA. The American Astronomical Society has grave concerns about the deep cuts to science funding. The $1.7 trillion plan proposes slashing $163 billion in federal spending for the next fiscal year. In astronomy, these cuts would mean many studies of our solar system, galaxy and the universe around us will cease. They’ll send a generation of American scientific talent into other professions or to other countries, the AAS says. The AAS released this statement on May 2, 2025, on its Board of Trustees’ statement in response to the White House budget request for Fiscal Year 2026. It has more than 8,000 members and was established in 1899.
  • The proposal would increase defense spending by 13% to $1 trillion. It would also provide a “historic” $175 billion investment to “fully secure the border,” according to an Office of Management and Budget letter. The administration is pushing to have these increases – which includes $119 billion in defense spending – included in the budget reconciliation bill Congress is currently assembling. Democrats have typically objected to raising defense funding without corresponding increases to certain non-defense spending. The blueprint also calls for sweeping cuts to a multitude of discretionary programs that the Trump administration has been dismantling since it took office in January. The proposal outlines President Donald Trump’s vision and provides recommendations to Congress for fiscal year 2026 spending, but lawmakers are not required to follow it.

Country-by-Country Breakdown:

Astronomers respond to President’s FY 2026 budget request

U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposed fiscal year 2026 budget would cut 56% to the National Science Foundation, 47% to NASA. The American Astronomical Society has grave concerns about the deep cuts to science funding. The $1.7 trillion plan proposes slashing $163 billion in federal spending for the next fiscal year. In astronomy, these cuts would mean many studies of our solar system, galaxy and the universe around us will cease. They’ll send a generation of American scientific talent into other professions or to other countries, the AAS says. The AAS released this statement on May 2, 2025, on its Board of Trustees’ statement in response to the White House budget request for Fiscal Year 2026. It has more than 8,000 members and was established in 1899. Read full article

Trump budget proposes $1 trillion for defense, slashes education, foreign aid, environment, health and public assistance

The proposal would increase defense spending by 13% to $1 trillion. It would also provide a “historic” $175 billion investment to “fully secure the border,” according to an Office of Management and Budget letter. The administration is pushing to have these increases – which includes $119 billion in defense spending – included in the budget reconciliation bill Congress is currently assembling. Democrats have typically objected to raising defense funding without corresponding increases to certain non-defense spending. The blueprint also calls for sweeping cuts to a multitude of discretionary programs that the Trump administration has been dismantling since it took office in January. The proposal outlines President Donald Trump’s vision and provides recommendations to Congress for fiscal year 2026 spending, but lawmakers are not required to follow it. Read full article

Global Perspectives Summary:

Global media portray this story through varied cultural, economic, and political filters. While some focus on geopolitical ramifications, others highlight local impacts and human stories. Some nations frame the story around diplomatic tensions and international relations, while others examine domestic implications, public sentiment, or humanitarian concerns. This diversity of coverage reflects how national perspectives, media freedom, and journalistic priorities influence what the public learns about global events.

How did your country report this? Share your view in the comments.

Sources:

Source: https://www.eenews.net/articles/trump-proposes-smallest-national-science-foundation-budget-in-decades/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *