Trump’s proposed budget deals another big blow to science, clean energy, and the environment
How did your country report this? Share your view in the comments.
Introduction:
The news topic “Trump’s proposed budget deals another big blow to science, clean energy, and the environment” has drawn international attention, with various media outlets providing diverse insights, historical context, political stances, and on-the-ground developments. Below is a curated overview of how different countries and media organizations have covered this topic recently.
Quick Summary:
- President Donald Trump proposed drastic budget cuts today that could stymie green energy projects, gut environmental protections, and further hobble health and climate research in the US. Topline budget proposals released today for the 2026 fiscal year would ax $15 billion in federal funding for renewable energy and new technologies to capture carbon dioxide emissions. It would strip nearly $18 billion from the National Institutes of Health, while the Environmental Protection Agency would see its budget slashed in half.“The budget document is laced with racist, anti-science, petty, and cruel language that should be beneath the president of the United States,” Gretchen Goldman, president ofThe Union of Concerned Scientists, said in a press release. The agency that leads weather forecasting and research into climate change and marine ecosystems, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, takes a major hit with a proposed $1.3 billion loss in funding.
- President Donald Trump proposed drastic budget cuts today that could stymie green energy projects, gut environmental protections, and further hobble health and climate research in the US. The proposal also reads like a tirade against civil rights and any solutions for combatting climate change. “The budget document is laced with racist, anti-science, petty, and cruel language that should be beneath the president of the United States,” the Union of Concerned Scientists said in a press release. The Environmental Protection Agency would see its budget slashed in half. The agency that leads weather forecasting and research into climate change and marine ecosystems, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, takes a major hit with a proposed $1.3 billion loss in funding.
- The US Office of Management and Budget sent Sen. Susan Collins an outline of what to expect from the Trump administration’s 2026 budget proposal. As expected, the budget includes widespread cuts, affecting nearly every branch of the federal government. But the budget goes well beyond those highlighted items, with nearly every place science gets done or funded targeted for cuts.Perhaps even more shocking is the language used to justify the cuts, which reads more like a partisan rant than a serious budget document. The National Institutes of Health would take a 40 percent cut and the National Science Foundation would lose 55 percent of its 2025 budget. The CDC would lose about $3.6 billion from its current budget of $9.6billion, primarily due to the shuttering of a number of divisions within it. The OMB suggests that these costs will get lower due to expanded energy production and, anyway, states should be paying for it.
Country-by-Country Breakdown:
Original Coverage
President Donald Trump proposed drastic budget cuts today that could stymie green energy projects, gut environmental protections, and further hobble health and climate research in the US. Topline budget proposals released today for the 2026 fiscal year would ax $15 billion in federal funding for renewable energy and new technologies to capture carbon dioxide emissions. It would strip nearly $18 billion from the National Institutes of Health, while the Environmental Protection Agency would see its budget slashed in half.“The budget document is laced with racist, anti-science, petty, and cruel language that should be beneath the president of the United States,” Gretchen Goldman, president ofThe Union of Concerned Scientists, said in a press release. The agency that leads weather forecasting and research into climate change and marine ecosystems, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, takes a major hit with a proposed $1.3 billion loss in funding. Read full article
Trump’s proposed budget deals another big blow to science, clean energy, and the environment
President Donald Trump proposed drastic budget cuts today that could stymie green energy projects, gut environmental protections, and further hobble health and climate research in the US. The proposal also reads like a tirade against civil rights and any solutions for combatting climate change. “The budget document is laced with racist, anti-science, petty, and cruel language that should be beneath the president of the United States,” the Union of Concerned Scientists said in a press release. The Environmental Protection Agency would see its budget slashed in half. The agency that leads weather forecasting and research into climate change and marine ecosystems, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, takes a major hit with a proposed $1.3 billion loss in funding. Read full article
Trump’s 2026 budget proposal: Crippling cuts for science across the board
The US Office of Management and Budget sent Sen. Susan Collins an outline of what to expect from the Trump administration’s 2026 budget proposal. As expected, the budget includes widespread cuts, affecting nearly every branch of the federal government. But the budget goes well beyond those highlighted items, with nearly every place science gets done or funded targeted for cuts.Perhaps even more shocking is the language used to justify the cuts, which reads more like a partisan rant than a serious budget document. The National Institutes of Health would take a 40 percent cut and the National Science Foundation would lose 55 percent of its 2025 budget. The CDC would lose about $3.6 billion from its current budget of $9.6billion, primarily due to the shuttering of a number of divisions within it. The OMB suggests that these costs will get lower due to expanded energy production and, anyway, states should be paying for it. Read full article
Global Perspectives Summary:
Global media portray this story through varied cultural, economic, and political filters. While some focus on geopolitical ramifications, others highlight local impacts and human stories. Some nations frame the story around diplomatic tensions and international relations, while others examine domestic implications, public sentiment, or humanitarian concerns. This diversity of coverage reflects how national perspectives, media freedom, and journalistic priorities influence what the public learns about global events.
How did your country report this? Share your view in the comments.
Sources:
- Original Article
- Trump’s proposed budget deals another big blow to science, clean energy, and the environment
- Trump’s 2026 budget proposal: Crippling cuts for science across the board
Source: https://www.theverge.com/news/660579/president-trump-budget-slash-science-health-energy-climate-environment